MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2558541011 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.3094.3094

Southwest Oncology Group Study S0530: A Phase 2 Trial of Clofarabine/ Cytarabine for Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia.

2009· article· en· W2558541011 sur OpenAlexaff
Anjali S. Advani, Holly Gundacker, Olga Sala‐Torra, Jerald P. Radich, Raymond Lai, Marilyn L. Slovak, Jeffrey E. Lancet, Steven Coutré, Robert K. Stuart, Martha P. Mims, Patrick J. Stiff, Frederick R. Appelbaum

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClofarabineMedicineInternal medicineCytarabineRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyOncologyLeukemiaMyeloid leukemiaAcute leukemiaSurgeryBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3094 Poster Board III-31 Clofarabine (Clo) has demonstrated single agent activity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia. Therefore, efforts have been undertaken to combine Clo with other antileukemic agents. Clo and cytarabine (Cy) target two different sites in DNA, have synergistic activity in vivo, and have non-overlapping toxicities, making this combination potentially promising for the treatment of relapsed/ refractory ALL. The maximum tolerated dose of this combination has been previously determined. The goals of this study were to: (1) evaluate the complete remission rate with and without complete count recovery (CR and CRi) of patients with relapsed/ refractory ALL treated with Clo/Cy; (2) to assess expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and nucleoside transporters in patients. Methods Patients were treated at SWOG institutions from February 2007 through July 2008. Clo was supplied by Genzyme. This protocol was reviewed and approved through each institution's review board. Eligibility criteria included: age ≥ 16 years, relapsed or refractory ALL (excluding Burkitts or mixed lineage leukemia), Zubrod performance status 0-2. CTGF expression was analyzed by triplicate RT-PCR on pre-treatment samples. Expression of the nucleoside transporters (hENT1, hCNT3, dCK) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. All patients received treatment with Clo 40 mg/m2/d and Cy 1 g/m2/d on Days 1-5. Response was assessed between Days 28-35. Patients with a partial remission (a 50% decrease in marrow blast percentage) could receive re-induction therapy. CR was defined as < 5% marrow blasts, neutrophils > 1,000/μL, platelets ≥ 100,000/μL, and no evidence of extramedullary disease. CRi was defined the same as CR but the platelet count could be < 100,000/μL. Patients with a CR could receive one cycle of consolidation therapy. Patients were to be accrued in 2 stages. In the first stage, 20 patients were to be registered. If at least 2 CR/ CRis were observed, an additional 15 patients were to be accrued (87% power to conclude that an agent with a response rate of 30% warrants further study). Results The study met criteria to proceed to the second stage. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. One patient is excluded from the analysis because treatment was not started due to high liver function tests after registration. Of the 36 evaluable patients, the median age was 41 years (range: 20-68), median WBC 5200/μL (range 900-93,700), and 23 patients (64%) were male. The median time from initial diagnosis to registration was 14 months (range 1-52 months). Nineteen patients (53%) were in first relapse, 7 (19%) in subsequent relapse, 1 (3%) with an unknown number of relapses, and 9 (25%) refractory. Two patients had received prior allogeneic BMT. Thirty-two patients have died, with 10 deaths occurring during protocol treatment and 7 of these deaths attributable to treatment [infection (3), pleural effusion (1) DIC (1), hypotension/ renal failure/ cardiac arrhythmia (1), multiorgan failure (1)]. Three patients received re-induction, and 1 patient received consolidation therapy. The CR/CRi rate was 17% (95% CI 6-33%), and median overall survival 3 months. At least 8 patients proceeded to BMT after completing protocol therapy. The number of patients accrued to this study was relatively small and the CR rate was low. Therefore, it is unlikely that any statistical differences in CR rate would be found, with respect to expression of various biologic correlates. However, there was a trend for patients with higher expression of CTGF having an inferior OS (p=0.13). In addition, although 70% of patients had high levels of hENT1 expression, only 33% and 44% of patients respectively had high levels of hCNT3 and dCK, which could serve as a mechanism of resistance to nucleoside analog therapy. Conclusion The CR/CRi rate in this study was modest. This regimen does not exhibit sufficient activity to warrant further testing unless it was significantly altered. However, this was a heavily pre-treated, poor risk population of patients. Of interest, low expression of nucleoside transporters and high expression of CTGF may predict response and OS. Larger prospective studies will be needed to confirm this. Therapies directly targeting these latter pathways or working independently of these pathways may help improve the prognosis of patients if these results are confirmed. Disclosures Advani: Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The combination of clofarabine/ cytarabine is investigational. Radich:Novartis: Research Funding. Lancet:Genzyme: Consultancy. Stuart:Genzyme: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,388
Écart entre enseignants0,347 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations18
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchTravaux en français237 207