Effects of Combined Calcium Hypochlorite and Chlorine Dioxide on Drinking Water Quality in Qatar and Disinfection by Products Formation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chlorite, chlorate, bromate and trihalomethane's (THMs) are included in WHO guidelines for drinking water quality. This study examined dosing different chlorine concentrations as calcium hypochlorite (Ca(ClO) 2 ) to water containing chlorine dioxide to evaluate the control of water quality in storage and the distribution system in Qatar with emphasis on chlorite, chlorate, bromate, pH and other parameters. Seven water samples were collected from the Ras Laffan-Q Power desalination plant outlet in amber bottles having a chlorine dioxide concentration of 0.3 mg/l in 1 liter. The bottles were spiked with Ca(ClO) 2 in sequence to give concentration of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mg/l as free chlorine. The mixtures were stored for 7 days at 25°C in the dark then heated to 45°C for two days more, and analyzed daily for physical and chemical parameters. A total of 312 sub-samples were analyzed for chlorite, chlorate, bromate, bromide, chloride, nitrate, nitrite, sulfate, THMs, temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, and chlorine and chlorine dioxide residuals. Chlorite concentration reductions were observed from the first day forward as 59, 65, 68, 94, 100, and 100%, and 17.4, 22.1, 39.2, 63.9, 66.0, 68.9% (from 0.157 to 0.049 mg/l) respectively based on observed means for seven days the commensurate respective chlorate concentrations increases were 196, 344, 516, 602, 703, 787% (from 0.035 to 0.313 mg/l) based on observed mean values for seven days. These data were statistically analyzed by multivariate regression. There were no significant changes in THMs concentrations and the reductions in chlorite and increases in chlorate concentration are chlorine dosage dependent. No bromate formation was observed. Chlorine dioxide levels decrease as the free chlorine residual levels increased. This study demonstrates that hypochlorite/chlorine can be used as an operational tool to control the chlorite levels, and slow the disappearance of the chlorine dioxide over time during distribution, that is usually faster than chlorine disappearance. The original chlorine dioxide dosage will determine the ultimate chlorate concentration, which must also be managed. References EPA guidance manual Alternative Disinfectants and Oxidants EPA 815-R-99-014, April 1999. 9-1 and 9-25. WHO, Guidelines for drinking-water quality, fourth edition. 2011(1)179,180, 325 and 326. E. Marco. Aieta, Paul V. Roberts; Kinetics of the reaction between molecular chlorine and chlorite in aqueous solution Environ. Sci. Technol., 1986. Daniel P. Hautman and David J. Munch. EPA - Method 300.1. Determination of inorganic anions in drinking water by ion chromatography Revision (1.0) 1997. J.W. Eichelberger, J.W. Munch, and T.A.Bellar EPA Method-524.2. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds In water by capillary column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, (Revision 4) 1992. Charles Z. Steinbergs, Removal of By-products of Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide at a Hemodialysis Center 1986. Katherine Alfredo, The Potential Regulatory implications of Chlorate (AWWA), March 2014. C.J. Volk, R. Hofmann, C. Chauret, G.A. Gagnon, G. Ranger, and R.C. Andrews, Implementation of chlorine dioxide disinfection: Effects of the treatment change on drinking water quality in a full-scale distribution system 2002. Mary Ann H. Franson, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water 2005 (21st, Edition) 4-67 and 4-79. Ron Hofmann, Robert C. Andrews, and Georges Ranger, Water Quality and Disinfection Impact of ClO2 Contamination by free Chlorine: A Case Study (NRC Canada) 2004. Mj Bekink and DJ Nozaic, Assessment of Chlorine Dioxide Proprietary Product for Water and Wastewater Disinfection May 2012.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».