MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2559200630 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.4669.4669

Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of a New Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IGIV3I 10% Grifols) In Subjects with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

2010· article· en· W2559200630 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Ali Khojasteh, Giraldo Kato, Nehal S. Parikh, Tammuella Singleton, Cameron K. Tebbi, Caroline Cromwell, Chieh‐Lin Fu, Craig M. Kessler, Jeffrey Letzer, Bruce Ritchie, Charles L. Sexauer, Kapil Saxena, Surendra Sirpal, Marcela Torres, Svetlana Loriya, Lidia Kovaleva, Virgilio Sandoval, Miguel Á. Sanz, Antonio Julià, María Angeles Rodríguez Montañés, Jordi Navarro

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineClinical endpointAdverse effectInternal medicineBleeding diathesisImmune thrombocytopeniaClinical trialPlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4669 Two similarly designed prospective, uncontrolled, open-label clinical trials were planned to assess the safety and efficacy of a new intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), IGIV3I 10% Grifols, in subjects with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the USA, Canada and Europe (Spain, Russia and the United Kingdom). Subjects were candidates to be enrolled if they had a diagnosis of chronic ITP and a baseline platelet count ≤ 20 × 109/l. Eligible subjects received treatment with IGIV3I 10% Grifols 1g/kg for 2 consecutive days or 0.4 g/kg for 5 consecutive days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the response rate, defined as the proportion of subjects reaching or exceeding the threshold value of 50 × 109/l on or before day 8 (American study) or on day 30 (European study) where day 1 is the day of the first infusion. Secondary efficacy endpoints were the time to response, defined as the number of days elapsed from day 1 to achievement of the threshold value; duration of response, defined as the number of consecutive days with a platelet count known to be ≥50 × 109/l; the maximum (peak) platelet count and regression of haemorrhagic diathesis for those subjects presenting with bleeding signs at baseline. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory parameters monitoring. A total of 27 subjects (18 adults and 9 pediatrics) have been enrolled, i.e. administered with at least one infusion of the product at any dose, in the study. Twenty-four (24) subjects (89%) were considered responders. This proportion was higher in pediatric subjects (9/9, 100%) than in adult subjects (15/18, 83%). The mean time to response was 1.6 days (Standard Deviation (SD) 0.9); the mean duration of response was 14.0 days (SD 12.1) and the mean maximum platelet count was 263 × 109/l (SD 195.6). Twenty-three (23) subjects (all the pediatric subjects 9/9 and 14/18 adults) presented with some sign of bleeding at baseline. All subjects (23/23, 100%) experienced an improvement in the haemorrhagic diathesis, regardless of some of them being considered non-responders according to the platelet count criterion. A total of 92 AEs potentially related to study drug were reported. The most common of these were headache (25 events), nausea (8 events), pyrexia (7 events) and chills (6 events). Only 1 AE was reported as definitely related to study drug, an event of palmar erythema. Two serious AEs (SAE) potentially related to the study drug were reported in 2 subjects. One of them was an unexpected laboratory alteration which consisted in leukopenia and decreased hemoglobin and advised to maintain the subject hospitalized for further observation during the weekend. The reaction was transient, without complications or other clinical symptoms and total recovery of the normal laboratory values. The second SAE was an event of thrombosis in the right humeral vein, in a patient with a number of predisposing medical conditions. At the time of discharge the patient's overall condition was satisfactory. Analysis of AEs, clinical laboratory values, physical assessments and vital signs did not indicate any safety concerns for subjects receiving the study drug and are in line with those expected for the ITP population treated with IVIG. Both primary and secondary efficacy endpoints show a good response to the product in terms of rapid elevation of platelet counts to an hemostatic level in line with what is expected for an IVIG product. Moreover, the improvement of the baseline bleeding diathesis even in patients considered as non-responders according to the platelet count criterion is highly suggestive of the clinical efficacy of the product. Overall, these results indicate that treatment with the new IGIV3I 10% Grifols is safe and efficacious for rapidly increasing platelet counts in chronic ITP subjects and improving their bleeding diathesis. Disclosures: Khojasteh: Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Kato:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Parikh:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Singleton:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Tebbi:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Cromwell:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Fu:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Kessler:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Letzer:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Ritchie:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Sexauer:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Saxena:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Sirpal:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Torres:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Loriya:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Kovaleva:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Sandoval:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Sanz:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Julià:Grifols S.A.: Research Funding. Montañés:Grifols S.A.: Employment. Navarro:Grifols S.A.: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→