9 EVALUATION OF A MODIFIED GnRH-BASED TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION PROTOCOL ASSOCIATED WITH ESTRUS DETECTION IN CYCLIC BEEF HEIFERS INSEMINATED WITH SEX-SELECTED SEMEN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study compared pregnancy per TAI (P/TAI) between sex-selected and conventional semen in cyclic beef heifers subjected to the modified (without initial GnRH) 5-day Co-synch protocol and evaluated the usefulness of an oestrus detection (ED) to identify heifers that were most likely to conceive. Heifers (n = 1034; 13 to 15 months of age) at three locations were scanned by ultrasonography to determine cyclicity (presence of corpus luteum) and reproductive tract normalcy. Cyclic heifers (n = 940) received a 1.38-g progesterone-releasing device (CIDR; Zoetis Animal Health, Florham Park, NJ, USA) on Day 0, CIDR removal and 500 µg of cloprostenol (Estroplan; Vetoquinol NA Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada) on Day 5, and 100 µg of GnRH (Fertiline; Vetoquinol NA Inc.) along with TAI on Day 8 (72 ± 1 h after CIDR removal). On Day 5, heifers received ED patches (EstrotectTM; Estrotect Inc.) that were scored from 0 to 3, based on colour change between initial application and Day 8; 0 = unchanged, 1 = =50% colour change, 2 = >50% colour change, 3 = missing. Heifers were assigned by ear-tag number to be inseminated with frozen–thawed sex-selected or conventional semen from either of two sires available commercially. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal ultrasonography 28 (herd A) or 48 (herds B and C) days after TAI. Data were analysed using the PROC GLIMMIX in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), with herd included as a random effect. The CIDR retention rate was 98%; P/TAI in heifers that lost the CIDR was 21%. Pregnancy per TAI [% (no.)] did not differ (P > 0.05) between sires [58.4 (426) v. 58.0 (414) for sires A and B, respectively], but it was higher (P < 0.01) for conventional semen [63.7 (422) v. 52.6 (418)]. An interaction between sire and type of semen (P = 0.07) revealed that sex-selected semen from bull B had the lowest P/TAI [49.3 (203)]. Overall, heifers with an ED patch scored 2 had greater (P < 0.01) P/TAI [64.8 (526)] than those scored 0 [42.9 (170)] or 1 [46.8 (79)]. Heifers with a missing ED patch had intermediate P/TAI [58.5 (65)]. However, the effect of ED patch scoring on P/TAI depended on type of semen. In heifers inseminated with conventional semen, PTAI was significantly lower (P < 0.01) in those with an ED patch scored 0 [49.4(87)] compared to those with a patch scored 2 [69.6 (270)]. In heifers inseminated with sex-selected semen, P/TAI was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in those with an ED patch scored 0 [36.1(83)] or 1 [37.2 (43)] compared with those scored 2 [59.8 (256)] or 3 [58.3 (36)]. In summary, P/TAI was greater in heifers inseminated with conventional semen. However, the P/TAI obtained with the modified GnRH-based TAI protocol in cyclic heifers inseminated with sex-selected semen was encouraging. In addition, the Estrotect oestrus detection patches were considered useful to identify animals for TAI with sex-selected semen and could be used to increase the adoption of this technology in beef herds. This study was supported by Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Vetoquinol NA Inc., Estrotect Inc. and collaborative beef producers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».