Thomas Walter Bannerman Kibble

Thomas Walter Bannerman Kibble, who died in London on 2 June 2016, is best known for his deep insights into the nature of symmetry breaking and its consequences. His research combined ideas from high-energy and condensed-matter physics and had a profound effect on both. He was admired as much for his kindness and humanity as for his contribution to physics. Thomas Walter Bannerman Kibble © IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON/MIKE FINN-KELCEYPPT|High resolutionTom was born in Madras, India, on 23 December 1932. His father was a professor of mathematics. Tom obtained his MA in mathematics and natural philosophy in 1955, his BSc in physics in 1956, and his PhD in mathematical physics, under John Polkinghorne, in 1958, all from the University of Edinburgh. A year later he joined the physics faculty of Imperial College London; he was associated with Imperial for the rest of his life.Tom was widely revered throughout the UK and the international physics community for his profound, quick mind; his mastery of modern physics; his deep humility; and his willingness to help others. His openness to new ideas drew many to seek his opinion. UK theoretical cosmology workshops, for example, started out as small informal gatherings in his office but grew into major meetings that would attract more than a hundred attendees. Tom was head of Imperial’s physics department from 1983 to 1991 during difficult times, and left it in a healthy condition. His sense of morality and social responsibility led him to join and eventually chair Scientists Against Nuclear Arms, which was a significant force in mobilizing scientists in the UK to speak out against nuclear weapons.Among Tom’s seminal physics ideas, two stand out. A 1964 paper he coauthored with Gerald Guralnik and Carl Hagen described a spontaneous symmetry-breaking mechanism that in theories with local gauge symmetries endows elementary excitations with mass. That same mechanism was independently and simultaneously proposed by Robert Brout and François Englert and by Peter Higgs, who also pointed out that it would lead to what is now known as the Higgs boson. In 1967 Tom generalized the symmetry-breaking mechanism to explain why some vector bosons become massive while leaving the photon massless. The results were central to the unification of electromagnetic and weak interactions. Many physicists thought the 1967 paper was so influential that Tom should have been included in the award of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics. Although he missed out, he never showed any disappointment; such was his modesty.Understanding the consequences of symmetry breaking in cosmological phase transitions was the second of Tom’s deep insights. Phase transitions are traditionally studied in equilibrium. Equilibrium phases have long-range order—the system symmetry is everywhere broken the same way (for example, the same lattice orientation in the whole crystal or the same phase of the quantum wavefunction in the whole superfluid). In the nascent universe that cools after the Big Bang, symmetry-breaking phase transitions are expected.Tom realized that rapid post–Big Bang cooling leaves no time for the universe to build a uniform consensus about how to break symmetry: A new, local phase is independently established in domains of the size of the causal horizon at the transition instant. In the nascent universe, that horizon is a tiny fraction of our present universe.A mosaic of different broken-symmetry choices must therefore appear when the transition is rapid. As Tom pointed out in a seminal 1976 paper, such disparate choices lead to the formation of topological defects—relics of the pretransition phase. In superfluids, they are the familiar vortex lines. Their analogue, cosmic strings, is the hypothetical early-universe example.Causality sets the lower limit on the density of topological defects in the early universe. Tom speculated that structures we observe, such as galaxies, may be seeded by cosmic strings. Moreover, topological defects create magnetic monopoles in all viable particle-physics models, yet we do not see them. That tension, which grew out of Tom’s work, led to the development of inflationary cosmology. Tom was truly a trailblazer of those very ambitious and far-reaching scenarios for the universe.The consequences of Tom’s work are profound and dramatic. Their exploration remains one of the main subjects of cosmology, even though massive cosmic strings that could have resulted in galaxy formation are ruled out by measurements of the microwave background.Symmetry breakings can occur at any temperature, from somewhat below the Planck temperature of ~1038 K post–Big Bang to ~10−9 K for gaseous Bose–Einstein condensates. Phase transitions are famously universal—their near-critical behavior is independent of microphysical details. Thus, although relativistic causality (light’s finite speed) isn’t relevant for experimentally accessible transitions, Tom’s insight that broken symmetry must be chosen locally is crucial; his realization that rapid transitions lead to defects also applies to condensed-matter physics. One can replace relativistic causality with reasoning based on scaling of a system’s “reflexes” that deteriorate near the critical point (“critical slowing down”) or, equivalently, rely on the existence of a sonic horizon (an analogue of the causal horizon) to predict the size of the domains that break symmetry and, hence, estimate the density of defects. (See Tom’s feature article, Physics Today, September 2007, page 47.) The past few years have seen increasingly precise quantitative confirmations of Tom’s ideas in systems that range from solid state, such as multiferroics, to Bose–Einstein condensates.Tom’s legacy is evident in the scope of his work—from the origin of fundamental forces via cosmology and particle physics to condensed matter. His contributions were recognized by numerous prizes, including the first Nature/NESTA lifetime achievement award for mentoring, in 2005; the American Physical Society’s 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize (shared with the other discoverers of the Higgs boson); the Royal Medal of the Royal Society in 2012; a knighthood, bestowed on him in 2014; and, posthumously, the Isaac Newton Medal of the Institute of Physics.© 2016 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.