Grafting of the carbon allotropes and polypyrrole via a Kevlar-type organic linker: the correlation of carbon structure/morphology with electrochemistry of the composite electrode
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The important requirement that needs to be fulfilled for an effective capacitor is fast energy uptake and release [ 1 , 2 ]. Other important features are a long-lasting cycle life, stability and high specific capacitance. They all can be improved by proper chemical, structural and morphological modification of the electrode materials [ 3 ]. Currently, in field of energy storage/conversion electronics, one of the most important task is to replace/decrease the usage of toxic heavy metals by carbonaceous materials that operate with relatively mild electrolytes [ 4 ]. Carbon allotropes such as carbon nanotubes and graphene are the most promising, and thus became essential components that could reach characteristics similar or greater than metallic electrodes [ 5 ]. This is however very challenging since carbons have lower energy density, and consequently, smaller specific capacitance [ 6 ]. On the other hand, carbon-based supercapacitors can store energy and be charged very fast during the reversible adsorption/desorption process of ions in double-layer capacitors, or by the counter-ion doping in pseudo-capacitors [ 7 , 8 ]. Both pseudo-capacitors and electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) have possibilities to improve their specific capacitance by expanding the specific surface and increasing the number of redox active centers (for pseudo-capacitors) [ 9 , 10 ]. Many studies have shown that a combination of both types results in a synergistic improvement of the total capacitance, especially when pseudo-capacitors from the group of conjugated polymers (e.g., polypyrrole or polyaniline) are used. These carbon-polymer hybrid materials or composites outperform their individual components [ 11 – 13 ]. The synergistic improvement is generated by two effects. First, is the increase in conductivity for the pseudo-capacitors resulting in faster ion diffusion that restricts the capacitance [ 14 ]. This process is particularly effective when a strong covalent bond (e.g., amide-type linker) between the polymer and carbon is created. The covalently grafted polymer benefits from improved mechanical stability provided by the carbon support. This combination also demonstrates more dynamic (flexible) structure that can accommodate volumetric changes taking place upon the ion uptake/release in the polymer pseudo-capacitor. The high surface area carbon facilitates uniform distribution of the polymer particles, which is critical during the extensive charge–discharge (shrinking–stretching). Such volumetric changes for a thick and uneven polymer electrode accelerate its degradation due to the local inhomogeneity of the charge distribution (surface with less conductive fractions). All these phenomena shorten the electrode cycle life [ 15 ]. Another important factor is the electronic interaction at the carbon-linker-polymer junction. In the reverse donor–acceptor system, the covalently bound conductive polymer acts as an electron acceptor and the carbon allotrope as the electron donor, resulting in a more electrochemically stable system [ 16 ].
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».