MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2559755697 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.3010.3010

Treatment Outcome of North American Patients with Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

2016· article· en· W2559755697 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Mary Salib, Melania Pintilie, Rick Wang, John Kuruvilla, Vishal Kukreti, Michael Crump

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueT-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLymphomaInternal medicinePopulationCancerOncologyPediatrics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a rare, aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma, affecting patients from HTLV-1 endemic areas including Japan, the Caribbean, Latin America, Africa, and Northern Iran. Most of the literature regarding prognosis and management reflects experience from Japan, where the demographic and clinicopathologicfeatures may differ from other endemic countries. There are limited data on clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients from North America (NA) with ATLL (Philips, Cancer, 2010). Based on the available literature, however, prognosis remains poor, with few effective chemotherapeutic options. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with ATLL presenting to a NA tertiary care center. Our primary objectives were to (a) describe patient demographics, ATLL subtype, and presentation characteristics, (b) identify progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), (c) identify the impact of consolidation antiviral therapy on duration of response in this high-risk patient population. Methods: Patients with ATLL were identified from prospectively populated lymphoma and leukemia databases at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) referred for primary therapy; patients referred at relapse or for consideration of treatment in first response were also included if they received therapy at PMCC. Patients were included if they met current criteria for ATLL and had a positive HTLV-1 antibody test. Additional data were collected from patient charts including ethnicity, ATLL subtype, initial treatment, and response to therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographic data, ATLL subtype,immunophenotype, first-line therapy, and response. In patients who achieved a partial or complete response following first line therapy, a t-test was used to identify the impact of consolidative antiviral therapy on duration of response. Twenty-eight patients received their first-line therapy at PMCC and Kaplan-Meyer estimates were used to calculate the PFS and OS for this population. Results: Forty-three patients with ATLL were referred to PMCC from 1993 to 2014. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (20-69) and 55.8% were females (Table 1). The majority were of Caribbean descent (63%), followed by African (5%), Asian (3%), Middle Eastern (3%), or undocumented country of origin (28%). ATLL subtype consisted of lymphomatous (44%), acute (35%) and smoldering (2%); subtype could not be fully determined in 28% of cases. 88% of patients were treated with front-line chemotherapy and 12% treated with upfront antiviral therapy alone (interferon alpha with or without antiretroviral therapy). At presentation, 16 (37%) patients had bone marrow involvement, 11 (26%) had CNS involvement, 5 (12%) had lytic lesions, 5 (12%) had skin involvement, and 7 (16%) had hypercalcemia. Immunophenotype based on flow cytometry of peripheral blood or lymph node biopsy was available for 27 patients. Twelve patients (44%) were positive for CD4, CD5, CD3, CD2 and CD25; 3 were double positive for CD4 and 8. The majority of patients were CD7 negative (78%) and commonly CD8 negative (44%). Three patients were also negative for CD25 (11%). Following primary chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone, 30% (13 of 43) patients achieved a partial or complete remission; the remaining 30 patients experienced disease progression during or at completion of chemotherapy. All responding patients experienced disease relapse; median duration of response was 17.4 months. Five patients (38.5%) received consolidative antiviral therapy, however, there was no statistically significant difference in duration of response (p=0.20). Twenty eightpatients received first-line therapy at PMCC. Median PFS for this group was 0.42 years (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 1.25) (Figure 1). Median OS 1.29 years (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 2.26) (Figure 2). Conclusion: The outcome of patients with ATLL in this retrospective observational study are very poor. Within the limits of the nationalities of patients referred to ourcenter, NA ATLL patients present with acute or lymphomatous subtypes, and have a high incidence of CNS involvement. Complete response rate to chemotherapy commonly used in other T cell lymphomas is low, and incorporation of alternative regimens and antibody therapies should be tested in primary therapy of ATLL. Disclosures Kuruvilla: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria. Kukreti:Lundbeck: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,086
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,419

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetT-cell and Retrovirus StudiesTravaux en français237 207