MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2560013418 · doi:10.1086/689234

<i>Saving Lives in Wartime China: How Medical Reformers Built Modern Healthcare Systems amid War and Epidemics, 1928–1945</i>, by John R. Watt. Leiden: Brill, 2014. xxii+339 pp. €135.00/US$175.00 (cloth).

2016· article· en· W2560013418 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe China Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrillWattChinaHealthcare systemHealth careAncient historyPolitical scienceHistoryClassicsLawPower (physics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Previous articleNext article FreeReviewsSaving Lives in Wartime China: How Medical Reformers Built Modern Healthcare Systems amid War and Epidemics, 1928–1945, by John R. Watt. Leiden: Brill, 2014. xxii+339 pp. €135.00/US$175.00 (cloth).Marta E. HansonMarta E. HansonJohns Hopkins University Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreAlthough several fine histories of modern East Asia recently have been written, none of them integrated public health as a narrative thread, much less a central theme. Reading John Watt's Saving Lives in Wartime China reaffirms to me that public health is one of the central themes of twentieth-century East Asia. This neglect of public health and medical transformations in survey narratives of the period is arguably more because of their authors' professional training in other dimensions of history than the actual significance of such transformations in modern East Asian history. This absence is gradually being remedied with the new scholarship of the past decade that integrates public health and medical reforms into twentieth-century Chinese and East Asian history.1Related to the political and military history of the first half of twentieth-century China, in this new book Watt argues that the Communist Party (CCP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) took radically different approaches to saving the lives of their soldiers and the peasants that had dramatically different consequences. Whereas the KMT did not provide adequately either for the nutrition or the health care of its conscript armies nor did it hold back from short-term military decisions that resulted in killing millions of Chinese civilians, the CCP's policy to protect the lives of its soldiers as well as peasants who joined them proved decisive in the eventual Communist victory and establishment of the PRC. Watt aims "to pull healthcare, death and lifesaving into mainstream analysis of 1) bitter conflicts characterizing the history of Nationalist China, 2) the will to promote better care of vulnerable people despite the forces resisting this goal" (14). He places the work of specific medical reformers at the center of Republican Chinese history and connects the enormous loss of life in 1930s and 1940s China from war, famine, disease, and malnutrition to the comparable loss of life in the huge conscript armies of World War I. He thus brings the Chinese causalities of the period into a comparison with those in Europe during the world wars.Before Saving Lives, John Watt wrote a book about the American Bureau for Medical Aid to China's first half-century of medical philanthropy in Taiwan: Friend in Deed: ABMAC and the Republic of China, 1937–87. Both that book and Saving Lives in Wartime China examine medical reformers and their role in developing modern health-care systems in Chinese-speaking regions, but the new book addresses their failures as well as successes within extremely constraining circumstances and deeply problematic institutions. The book's seven core chapters are preceded by an introduction that weaves disease, poverty, and war around the book's central theme on saving lives. The book's conclusion discusses why saving lives mattered not just epidemiologically and demographically but also politically and historically.Each chapter examines this theme during a specific period, with different actors, public health policies and institutions, and therefore differing consequences. Chapter 1 elaborates on epidemics, wars, and public health-care advocacy in China during 1911–28, setting a foundation for two chapters about the following decade: chapter 2 on the advances and setbacks in the KMT government's public health management during 1928–37 and chapter 3 on the Red Army's health services in Jiangxi and on the Long March during 1927–36. The Sino-Japanese War of 1937–45 is the broad historical context for the remaining four chapters. Chapter 4 addresses the Japanese invasion, army medicine, and the Chinese Red Cross Medical Relief Corps during 1937–42, and chapter 5 considers "how rigidity, disease, and hunger undermined Nationalist China's military medical reformers" (159). Chapter 6 examines public health amid the turmoil of war during 1938–49, and chapter 7 turns to Yan'an's health services under the Communist Party in 1937–45.Watt did not integrate into his arguments several important related works that demonstrate public health history's centrality to modern Chinese history, including books by Carol Benedict and Furth and Leung (editors), or that established hygienic modernity as a key analytical concept for the period (Rogaski)—although he cites Rogaski, he does not engage with her concept—or the earlier articles by historians of Chinese medicine in Republican China who clarified the multiple roles of Chinese medical practitioners in the making of modern China. But these are minor shortcomings in a book that provides by far the richest empirical evidence on "saving lives in wartime China" and the most persuasive arguments to date about why this mattered not just epidemiologically and demographically but also ethically. Historians of public health in East Asia, global public health, and public health policy as well as researchers and teachers of twentieth-century Chinese history will appreciate both the forceful arguments and the historical specifics synthesized in Watt's magnum opus. Notes 1. For example, books by Ruth Rogaski, Hygienic Modernity: Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty-Port China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004); Ka-che Yip, Disease, Colonialism, and the State: Malaria in Modern East Asian History (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2009); Michael Shiyung Liu, Prescribing Colonization: The Role of Medical Practices and Policies in Japan-Ruled Taiwan, 1895–1945 (Ann Arbor, MI: AAS, 2009); Charlotte Furth and Angela Ki Che Leung, eds., Health and Hygiene in Chinese East Asia: Policies and Public in the Long Twentieth Century (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010); Tina Phillips Johnson, Childbirth in Republican China: Delivering Modernity (1911–1949) (Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2011); Alexander Bay, Beriberi in Modern Japan: The Making of a National Disease (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2012); Liping Bu, Darwin Stapleton, and Ka-che Yip, eds., Science, Public Health and the State in Modern Asia (London: Routledge, 2012); John DiMoia, Reconstructing Bodies: Biomedicine, Health and Nation-Building in South Korea since 1945 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013); Bridie Andrews, Making Modern Medicine in China, 1860–1960 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2014); Bridie Andrews and Mary Brown Bullock, eds., Medical Transitions in Twentieth-Century China (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014); Hsiang-lin Lei, Neither Donkey nor Horse: When Chinese Medicine Encountered the State, 1910–1949 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014); Liping Bu and Ka-che Yip, eds., Public Health and National Reconstruction in Post-war Asia: International Influences, Local Transformations (London: Routledge, 2012); Ka-che Yip and Yuen Sang Leung, eds., Health Policy and Disease in Colonial and Post-colonial Hong Kong, 1841–2003, Routledge Studies in the Modern History of Asia (London: Routledge, 2016); Robert Peckham, Epidemics in Modern Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016); Miriam Gross, Farewell to the God of Plague: Chairman Mao's Campaign to Deworm China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016); Liping Bu, Science, Public Health and the State in Modern Asia (Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis, 2011); Brett Walker, The Toxic Archipelago: A History of Industrial Disease in Japan (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2010). Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The China Journal Volume 77January 2017 Published on behalf of the Australian Centre on China in the World at the Australian National University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/689234 For permission to reuse, please contact [email protected]PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,232
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle