DIFFERENCES IN EMG STIMULATION THRESHOLDS AT THE APICAL PEDICLE IN PAEDIATRIC SPINE DEFORMITY CORRECTION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The evolution of operative technology has allowed correction of complex spinal deformities. Neurological deficits following spinal instrumentation is a devastating complication and the risk is especially high in those with complex sagittal and coronal plane deformities. Prior to intraoperative evoked potential monitoring, spinal cord function was tested using the Stagnara Wake up test, typically performed after instrumentation once the desired correction has been achieved. This test is limited as it does not reflect the timeframe in which the problem occurred and it may be dangerous to some patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring allows timely feedback of the effect of instrumentation and curve correction on the spinal cord. Pedicle screws that are malpositioned can result in poor fixation or neuronal injury. Evoked EMG monitoring can aid in accurate placement. A positive EMG response can alert the surgeon to a potential pedicle breech and allow them to reassess the placement of their hardware intraoperatively. The stimulation threshold is affected by the amount of surrounding bone acting as an insulator to electrical conduction and is variable in different regions of the spine. In the non-deformed, lumbar spine stimulation thresholds have been established. Such guidelines have not been well-developed for the thoracic spine, or for severely scoliotic spines. Thus our primary objective was to compare the stimulation threshold of the apical pedicle on the concave side to the stimulation threshold of the pedicles at the upper and lower instrumented levels. Intraoperative EMG stimulation thresholds were done at 192 apical pedicles on the concave side of the deformity and then compared to those thresholds found at 169 terminal level pedicles. Only pedicles for which a stimulation threshold was found were reported and excluded those where a breech was suspected. The lowest stimulation required for an EMG response was documented to a maximum stimulation of 20 mA. The mean threshold at the apex was 16.62 milliamps (mA) compared to 18.25mA at the terminal levels. This was compared with the t-test and showed a statistically significant difference (p In this study we report only the thresholds for the concave side, the pedicle that is most likely to be reduced in size. The threshold for stimulation is reduced compared to those seen at the highest and lowest instrumented level. Most of the apexes are located in the mid-thoracic spine with the highest instrumented levels being in the high thoracic spine and the lowest levels being in the lumbar spine. This study provides preliminary evidence that the apical, concave pedicle has a lower threshold than the end pedicles and one cannot rely on established thresholds from different areas of the spine. The surgeon should be cognisant of these differences when instrumenting at the apical level. Ongoing work is examining the convex apex threshold as well as the relationship between the effect of age and a diagnosis other than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».