A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 2 Trial Comparing Pegfilgrastim with Filgrastim as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Heil et al (Blood ‘97) demonstrated that the duration of neutropenia and its clinical consequences following induction chemotherapy for AML were significantly reduced by the addition of filgrastim, with no increased risk of death, second malignancy or relapse (ASH ‘99). A single injection of pegfilgrastim has been shown to be comparable to daily injections of filgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The primary aim of this trial was to estimate the difference in time to recovery from severe neutropenia (SN, ANC < 0.5 x109/L) in the first induction chemotherapy cycle (Induction 1) in AML subjects treated with pegfilgrastim or filgrastim. METHODS: Subjects with de novo AML received 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapy (idarubicin 12mg/m2 IV days 1–3, cytarabine 100mg/m2 IV 12 hourly days 1–7 [IA 3+7]) then, if in remission, consolidation chemotherapy (cytarabine 2 [subjects < 55 years] or 3g/m2 [subjects ≥ 55 years] IV 12 hourly days 1, 3, 5). Subjects received either single administration 6μg pegfilgrastim or daily 5μg/kg filgrastim starting 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy until neutrophil recovery. Time to recovery from SN was defined as the number of days from the first day of chemotherapy until the first of two ANC consecutive values after the nadir that were ≥ 0.5 x 109/L whereas duration of SN was defined as the total number of days during the cycle with an ANC < 0.5 x 109/L. RESULTS: Of 84 subjects randomised into the study, 83 received study drug (42 pegfilgrastim, 41 filgrastim). The treatment groups were generally well balanced for demographics and baseline characteristics. The median time to recovery from SN (ANC < 0.5 x109/L) in Induction 1 was 22 days in both treatment groups (95% CI for treatment difference: −1.9, 1.9). There was also no statistically significant difference in the median duration of SN between the 2 groups (21 days pegfilgrastim, 20 days filgrastim). Subjects in the filgrastim group required a median of 16 daily injections compared to a single administration of pegfilgrastim in the second group. Median serum concentration of pegfilgrastim in Induction 1 remained above clinically relevant concentrations until 21 days after the start of chemotherapy, results that are consistent with the neutrophil-mediated clearance of pegfilgrastim. The incidence of serious adverse events was comparable between the 2 groups except for infectious complications, which were higher in the filgrastim group (5 subjects [12%] pegfilgrastim versus 9 subjects [22%] filgrastim). CONCLUSION: In the setting of the first cycle of IA 3+7 induction chemotherapy in AML patients, once per cycle administration of 6 mg pegfilgrastim or daily administration of 5mg/kg filgrastim result in similar median time to recovery to ANC ≥ 0.5 x109/L. Pegfilgrastim is safe and well tolerated in this subject population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».