The Kick Seen 'Round the World: A Case Study in Crisis Management and Corporate Governance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Decision Dilemma Elevator video surveillance from July of 2014 in the upscale Private Residences at the Hotel Georgia in Vancouver, Canada showed a man and a dog entering the elevator. After entering the elevator, the video showed the man repeatedly kicking and yanking on the leash of the pup. After the video had been released to the media in Canada, there was an effort to identify the man in the video. One day after the incident, Desmond Hague was identified as the man in the video. Hague's behavior was described as uncharacteristic for the man who had been CEO of Centerplate, Inc. since 2009 and who was a veteran of the foodservice industry having served in leadership roles at IHOP, Safeway and Taco Bell (Centerplate, 2014). With Hague at the helm, Centerplate recently won the hospitality service bidding for the newly built Levi's Stadium, home of the famed San Francisco 49rs football team. Aware of the incident, Centerplate's Board of Directors needed to determine what course(s) of action to consider. The dog walked away from the incident, but animal abuse charges could have been filed against their CEO. How could that impact their CEO and Centerplate? The incident occurred during Hague's personal time. Thus, is it the company's concern, or should they stay out of it? Should Hague be supported with counseling, reprimanded, placed on corporate probation, fined, forced to resign, fired, or some combination of these? Centerplate, Inc. Centerplate, a hospitality services company, was founded as Automatic Company of America in 1929 by Nathaniel Leverone. After success with various innovations in the vending machine business, which included branching into sandwiches, ice cream, cakes and cigarettes, the company's first entree into large scale hospitality services was when the Philadelphia Athletics moved into their stadium in Kansas City in 1954. From that time on, what is now Centerplate had continued success in non-vended food services including hotels, airlines, restaurants, and recreational areas. Pivotal moments in the company's history were its acquisitions by International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (ITT) in 1968, which was followed by divestment and another acquisition by Trans World Airlines in 1973. After TW Holdings, changed its name to Flagstar and sold the Canteen (Centerplate) arm of the business to a group of the company's high-level executives, Centerplate, Inc. was founded and landed in its long-term home in Spartanburg, South Carolina (Pederson, 2006). Centerplate's mission statement read: Our mission is to make it better to be there. Every time. Everywhere. By understanding what matters most-to guests, to fans, to communities-we help make the most of every moment through a strategic approach to hospitality. We craft one-of-a-kind guest experiences that reflect purpose and place, so your presence is valued, your returns are rewarding, and your community connections are authentic. That's the power of Centerplate. Making it better to be there since 1929. (Centerplate, 2015) A privately held company, Centerplate ranked 5th among North American Foodservice Firms by sales in millions of dollars (Lazich, 2014): 1. Aramark $9,019 2. Sodexo $8,000 3. Delaware North $2,200 4. Compass Group $1,100 5. Centerplate $ 825 In addition to its long and successful history, Centerplate reached this status by providing food services for Super Bowls, World Series, NCAA tournaments, World Cup games and Presidential Inauguration Balls. Also, it had long-term service contracts with some of the best-known sporting complexes, including historic venues such as San Francisco's Candlestick Park and newly built stadiums such as Carolinas Stadium in Charlotte, home of the NFL's Carolina Panthers (Pederson, 2006). Des Hague Hague became CEO of Centerplate in 2009 after serving in executive roles at IHOP, Safeway, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and 7-Eleven (Roberts 2014). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».