NOVEL RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION TREATMENT OF TUMOUR AND BONE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary A novel bipolar cooled radiofrequency ablation probe, optimised for bone metastases applications, is shown in two preclinical models to offer a safe and minimally invasive treatment option that can ablate large tissue volumes and preserve the regenerative ability of bone. Introduction Use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating of skeletal metastases has been rising, yet its impact on bone tissue is poorly understood. 2–11 RF treatment induces frictional heating and effectively necrotises tissue in a local and minimally invasive manner.1 Bipolar cooled RF (BCRF) is a significant improvement to conventional RF whereby larger regions can be safely treated, protecting sensitive neighbouring tissues from thermal effects. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a novel bipolar RFA probe to create large contained lesions within healthy pig vertebrae and its determine its effects on bone and tumour cells in a rabbit long bone tumour model. Methods Following a pre-treatment MRI, a BCRF probe was placed transpedicularly into targeted lumbar vertebrae of six Yorkshire pigs. Energy was delivered for 15min at a set temperature of 65°C (n=2 per animal) with a sham control performed at a non-contiguous level (n=1 per animal). Post-treatment neurologic evaluation, MRI and histology were used to characterise the region of effect. Twelve New Zealand White Rabbits received a 200 µl injection of VX2 tumour cells into one femur. On day 14, half of the tumour-bearing and contralateral healthy femora were RF-treated (n=6 per group). RF-treated femora were compared to tumour-bearing and healthy sham groups (n=6 per group) through pre (day 14) and post treatment (day 28) MRI and histology (H&E (for general evaluation), AE1/AE3 (for VX2 tumour cell evaluation), TRAP (for osteoclast evaluation) and TUNEL (for osteocyte evaluation)). Results In treated porcine spines there were no neurological complications. MR imaging confirmed a 2cm oval shaped ablative zone. External thermocouple measurements indicated output values in the physiological temperature range suggesting treatment was safely confined within targeted vertebrae. Histological results correlated well with the ablation regions determined using MRI sequences in both models. In rabbit femora, large zones of RF ablation (average volume 12.9±5.5 cm3) extended beyond the femur cortex (corresponding to the probe design for human use) into the surrounding soft tissue. The RFA-treated tumour-involved specimens demonstrated a significant reduction in tumour volume compared to sham femora, however a small number of viable tumour cells remained within the ablation volume. Newly formed trabecular structures were also seen in all treated femora. TRAP staining demonstrated a significant reduction in osteoclast number post-RFA in both the tumour-involved and healthy groups. TUNEL staining revealed areas of patchy cortical osteocyte necrosis within the ablation zone. Discussion/Conclusions The large histologic region of effect created by RFA was consistent with MRI findings in both models. Treatment was contained in the porcine vertebrae without collateral damage to neighbouring sensitive structures. In the femora, while osteoclasts were found to be very susceptible to RFA, a small number of tumour cells and osteocytes in the treated regions remained viable. As the treatment zone did not encompass the full extent of the intramedullary lesions, it is possible that the sporadic VX2 cell viability may be explained by local tumour cell migration. Limited destruction of healthy osteocytes by RFA may be desirable in restoring bone health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».