MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2561764353 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4184.4184

Live Term Birth and Two Ongoing Viable Pregnancies with Therapeutic Enoxaparin and Aspirin After Failure of Prophylactic Enoxaparin and Aspirin in Two Women with Thrombophilia and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

2009· article· en· W2561764353 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mala Varma, Vijaya L. Ganesh, Daniel E. Stein

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBlood disorders and treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineThrombophiliaAspirinLow molecular weight heparinAntiphospholipid syndromePregnancyLive birthHeparinThrombosisObstetricsGynecologySurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4184 The combination of prophylactic heparin and low-dose aspirin was shown in the 1990s to improve pregnancy outcome in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Antiphospholipid antibodies induce placental thrombosis. When associations between hereditary thrombophilias and RPL were reported in the early 2000s, we and other physicians (Rodger MA J Obstr Gyn Canada 2002) began empirically prescribing prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, low-dose aspirin, or the combination to pregnant women with thrombophilia and unexplained RPL. We observed high live birth rates. Data emerged showing live birth rates of 70.2-94% in pregnant women with RPL treated with low-dose low molecular weight heparin and/or low-dose aspirin. Only one report has addressed treatment after failure of low-dose low molecular weight heparin: Brenner and colleagues (Thromb Haemost 2000) treated 3 pregnant women with multiple thrombophilic defects with enoxaparin 60 mg x 2/day after failure of enoxaparin 40 mg x 2/day; all 3 pregnancies yielded live births. We report cases of a live term birth and two ongoing viable pregnancies with therapeutic enoxaparin,1.5 mg/kg SC, (TEP) and aspirin after failure of prophylactic enoxaparin, 40 mg SC, (PEP) and aspirin in two women with thrombophilia and RPL. A 33 year-old woman with a history of 2 unexplained miscarriages at 6 weeks (Patient 1) and a 42 year-old woman with a history of 3 unexplained miscarriages at 8 weeks (Patient 2) presented in April 2006 and in August 2007 respectively. Uterine malformations, acquired uterine defects, and hormonal abnormalities were ruled out. Parental karyotypes were normal. Thrombophilia evaluation included: factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene mutation, fasting homocysteine, protein C, protein S, antithrombin, IgG anticardiolipin antibody, IgM anticardiolipin antibody, lupus anticoagulant, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism. Positive results were: one copy each of the C677T and A1298C MTHFR mutations in Patient 1 and Patient 2; PAI-1 120 ng/mL and PAI-1 4G/4G polymorphism in Patient 2. The following describes the clinical course in both patients. Patient 1 was started on aspirin 81 mg daily and on clomiphene citrate to improve fertility. She conceived but miscarried at 7 weeks in June 2006. She underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) in December 2006 while continuing on aspirin. She started on PEP daily within 24 hours of egg retrieval. She miscarried twins at 6 and 8&1/2 weeks. In May 2007, she conceived through IVF while continuing on aspirin. She started on TEP daily within 24 hours of egg retrieval. Anti-Xa level was monitored monthly. Enoxaparin was adjusted to maintain the anti-Xa level between 0.6 and 1.2 ui/mL. She delivered a healthy term baby on January 10, 2008. She continued to take aspirin daily. She conceived naturally in February 2009. She started on TEP daily with monthly anti-Xa monitoring when her pregnancy was confirmed. She currently has a live 24-week gestation. Patient 2 was started on aspirin 81 mg daily. She conceived through IVF in May 2008. She started on PEP daily within 24 hours of egg retrieval. She miscarried in a few weeks. She conceived through IVF in October 2008 while continuing on aspirin. She started on PEP daily within 24 hours of egg retrieval. After two weeks when her pregnancy was confirmed PEP was increased to TEP. She miscarried in a few weeks. She conceived in May 2009 through IVF while continuing on aspirin. TEP with monthly anti-Xa monitoring was started prior to IVF when she started her ovarian stimulation medications. She currently has a live 16-week gestation. Our report corroborates the findings by Brenner and colleagues of a benefit of an increased enoxaparin dose after failure of a low dose. It is possible that the higher dose leads to better control of a placental thrombotic state. While the timing of initiation of thromboprophylaxis has been established for natural pregnancies (aspirin is started pre-conception; enoxaparin is started at pregnancy confirmation or at detection of the fetal heartbeat), optimal time for initiation of thromboprophylaxis in IVF pregnancies has not been determined. Ovarian stimulation for IVF leads to a hyperestrogenic state which increases thrombotic risk. It is possible that starting TEP at the time of initiation of ovarian stimulation in Patient 2 enabled her ongoing viable second-trimester pregnancy by optimizing placental conditions. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Aspirin and enoxaparin during pregnancy to prevent recurrent fetal loss.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetBlood disorders and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207