MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2562012807 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.646.646

Tet2 Is a Novel Regulator of Murine Macrophage Differentiation and Polarization

2015· article· en· W2562012807 sur OpenAlexaff
Alyssa Cull, Brooke Snetsinger, Michael J. Rauh

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHaematopoiesisBiologyMolecular biologyBone marrowEpigeneticsMyeloidGene expressionCancer researchImmunologyStem cellGeneGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The epigenetic regulator, TET2, catalyzes the conversion of methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Inactivating TET2 mutations are common in myeloid cancers such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Although TET2 has been characterized in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, little is known about its role in disease-relevant monocytes/macrophages (MΦ). Previously, we found increased expression of M2 MΦ-associated arginase 1 (Arg1) in TET2 -mutant CMML and Tet2 -deficient MΦ. Therefore, our goals were to (1) characterize Tet family expression during normal murine MΦ differentiation and polarization, (2) determine the effect of Tet2 -deficiency on broader M1-M2 MΦ spectrum gene signatures. Methods: Hematopoietic-specific Tet2+/- and Tet2-/- knockout mice were generated by breeding floxed Tet2(f/f) with Vav-Cre mice (JAX), in accordance with Queen's University's Animal Care protocols. MΦs obtained by peritoneal lavage (PMΦ) and bone marrow differentiation (BMMΦ) from 9-13 week old Tet2-/- and 20-40 week old Tet2+/- mice were treated with an M1 stimulus (100ng/mL LPS) or an M2 stimulus (10ng/mL Il-4). Comparative gene expression analysis was conducted using a 591 candidate gene Mouse Immunology Gene Expression CodeSet (NanoString). Blood plasma samples collected from Tet2f/f and Tet2-/- mice were sent for cytokine/chemokine array analysis (Eve Technologies). Results: A survey of Tet mRNA expression in wild-type C57BL/6 mouse whole BM showed that Tet1 was most abundantly expressed, with Tet2 and Tet3 having relative abundances of 0.56±0.05 and 0.09±0.01 respectively. In contrast, Tet2 expression peaked, while Tet1 expression diminished during BMMΦ differentiation. Suggesting a functional role, loss of murine Tet2 is associated with skewed myelomonocytic differentiation (i.e. CMML phenotype). In terminally-differentiated MΦ, Tet2 was the most abundantly expressed Tet gene, suggesting MΦ-specific functions. Consistent with this, following a 3-hour LPS stimulation, Tet2 mRNA levels increased 2- to 4-fold, whereas Il-4 failed to induce a similar increase in expression. Overall, our results suggested that Tet2 plays a role in M1 but not M2 macrophage polarization. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that loss of Tet2 would lead to M1 program dysregulation. PMΦs were obtained from Tet2f/f and Tet2-/- mice (n=2/ genotype) and RNA was harvested from untreated and LPS- or Il-4-treated cells. Pools of these RNA samples were then screened using Nanostring. Overall, M1-associated markers such as Stat1, Socs1, Nfkbiz, Il-6, Il-27, Il-12, Il-1 and Ccl2 were markedly increased by 2- to 50-fold in resting Tet2-/- PMΦs compared to matched Tet2f/f samples. These same M1 genes demonstrated a reduced ability to be induced by LPS treatment. We also found that while the expression of most M2 genes was similar in controls versus knockouts, Il-1rn and Arg1 were overexpressed, and Marco was decreased. This suggested that Tet2 -deficient MΦs possess a complex phenotype with a potential homeostatic response to M1 gene dysregulation. We have previously seen variable upregulation of Arg1 in mouse BMMΦs and PMΦs. Approximately 60% of Tet2-deficient mice (+/- and -/-) (n=20) tested for MΦ Arg1 mRNA expression demonstrated 2- to 90-fold increases in Arg1 compared to pooled Tet2f/f controls (n=5). We were interested in investigating the underlying mechanisms contributing to this dramatic increase in expression. Using Nanostring on pooled Tet2-deficient PMΦs with low (n=7) or high (n=8) Arg1 mRNA expression, we were able to identify genes whose expression significantly correlated with Arg1 overexpression: Cxcl3 (p=0.0329), Ppbp (p=0.0015), Cxcl1 (p=0.0104) and Ccl6 (p=0.0185). Of note, Ppbp was the most divergently expressed gene (46-fold difference) in Arg1 low vs Arg1 high macrophages, followed by Arg1 itself (14-fold difference). Suggesting a further environmental influence, blood plasma levels of TNF-alpha, Il-1b, Il-4, Il-10, Il-12 and Il-13 were significantly elevated in mice with high PMΦ Arg1 mRNA expression (n=5) compared to those with low expression (n=10). Conclusions: Tet2 is a novel regulator of murine MΦ, induced during MΦ differentiation and M1-polarization. Tet2 loss leads to complex disruption of the M1-M2 spectrum. We are currently exploring whether human TET2 mutations contribute to the abnormal immune environment of myeloid cancers. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→Travaux en français237 207→