MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2562208778 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.3754.3754

The Safety and Tolerability of Azacitidine (AZA) Are Comparable in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

2015· article· en· W2562208778 sur OpenAlexaff
John F. Seymour, Lewis R. Silverman, Hartmut Döhner, Pierre Fenaux, Ghulam J. Mufti, Valeria Santini, Mark D. Minden, Richard M. Stone, Lela M. Lucy, Stephen Songer, Donna Dougherty, Randy Hinkle, Dominique Gambini, C.L. Beach, Hervé Dombret

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicineMyelodysplastic syndromesAzacitidineAdverse effectPopulationNeutropeniaLenalidomideOncologyMultiple myelomaChemotherapyBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: AML and MDS are distinct, though largely overlapping, diseases, especially in older patients (pts) (Vardiman, Blood, 2008). Injectable AZA is the reference first-line treatment (Tx) for pts with higher-risk (HR) MDS ineligible for alloSCT (NCCN guidelines, v1.2016), as it improved overall survival in this population in the phase 3 AZA-001 (AZA-MDS) trial (Fenaux, Lancet Oncol, 2009). The safety profile of AZA in pts with MDS is well-established from clinical trials and post-marketing reporting (Santini, Eur J Haematol, 2010; Vidaza Package Insert, 2014). Recently, the safety and efficacy of AZA in older pts (≥65 years [yrs]) with AML and >30% marrow blasts were evaluated in the phase 3 AZA-AML-001 (AZA-AML) study (Dombret, Blood, 2015). Objective: Compare the safety and tolerability profile of AZA Tx in pts with HR-MDS in the AZA-MDS study with that in older pts with AML in the AZA-AML study. Methods: Safety analyses included all pts who received ≥1 AZA dose. The 2 studies used the same dosing regimen: SC AZA 75 mg/m2/day on days 1-7/28-day cycle. Eligible pts in AZA-MDS were age ≥18 yrs and in AZA-AML were ≥65 yrs. Safety was assessed based on frequency and severity (per CTCAE) of Tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), defined as new/worsening AEs during Tx. Tolerability was assessed by overall AZA Tx duration, median cycle length (dosing could be delayed or reduced based on toxicities), rate of AZA dose adjustments, and frequency of TEAEs leading to dose interruption, reduction, or discontinuation. Results: In AZA-MDS, median age of the AZA safety population (N=175) was 69 yrs (range 42-83) with 22% of pts ≥75 yrs. AZA pts in AZA-AML (N=236) were generally older, consistent with study design: median age 75 yrs (range 64-91) with 56% of pts ≥75 yrs. AZA-AML pts generally had higher ECOG PS (Grade 0-1, 77.6%; Grade 2, 22.5%) than pts in AZA-MDS (Grade 0-1, 92.0%; Grade 2, 6.9%). Pts in AZA-AML had lower median ANC at baseline (0.3x109/L [range 0-12] vs 0.9x109/L [0-38] in AZA-MDS), though median platelet (52 and 61 x109/L, respectively) and hemoglobin (95 and 96 g/L) values were similar. Pts in AZA-MDS received a median of 9 Tx cycles (range 1-39) and pts in AZA-AML received a median of 6 Tx cycles (1-28); overall exposure to AZA was similar: 169 pt-years in AZA-MDS and 175 pt-years in AZA-AML. In AZA-MDS and AZA-AML, respectively, 68% and 53% of pts received ≥6 AZA cycles and 36% and 32% received ≥12 cycles. In AZA-MDS and AZA-AML, 86% and 88% of pts, respectively, received all AZA cycles with no dose adjustments. The most common TEAEs in both studies were hematological and gastrointestinal, which tended to decrease with continued AZA Tx (Figure). Higher frequencies of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were reported in AZA-MDS, whereas, frequencies of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia and pneumonia were higher in AZA-AML (Table). TEAEs that resulted in AZA dose delays or reductions, respectively, were most frequently hematological and occurred in 47% and 11% of pts in AZA-MDS, and 49% and 3.4% in AZA-AML. In AZA-MDS and AZA-AML, TEAEs leading to discontinuation (excluding progression to AML in AZA-MDS) occurred in 13% (most frequently hematological) and 47% (most frequently infections or AML worsened) of pts, respectively. Rates of hematological TEAEs that led to study drug discontinuation were low in both studies (4.6% in AZA-MDS and 4.2% in AZA-AML), suggesting that these events were effectively managed with AZA dose modifications. Conclusions: The safety and tolerability of AZA in older pts with AML are consistent with the well-established safety profile of AZA in HR-MDS. Higher frequencies of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia and pneumonia in AML pts may be due to lower baseline ANC values with more pre-existing grade 3-4 neutropenia, as well as pt- and disease-related characteristics. No new or unexpected risks were identified in AZA-treated pts with AML. Rates of common TEAEs with continued Tx in pts with MDS and AML indicate a lack of cumulative toxicity and suggest that adverse effects of AZA are attenuated over time. Clinicians can use similar approaches to managing AZA-related TEAEs in pts with MDS or AML. Disclosures Seymour: Genentech, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Phebra: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: This abstract includes data related to the use of azacitidine in older AML patients with >30% BM blasts (AZA is approved for treatment of AML with 20-30% BM blasts).. Fenaux:AMGEN: Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria, Research Funding; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Santini:celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Onconova: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lucy:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Songer:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dougherty:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hinkle:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gambini:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207