MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2562701629 · doi:10.1542/gr.35-6-64

Oxygen Saturation and Bronchiolitis Severity

2016· article· en· W2562701629 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAAP Grand Rounds · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRespiratory viral infections research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBronchiolitisIconMedicineEmergency departmentPulse oximetrySupplemental oxygenOxygen saturationPediatricsOxygenInternal medicineRespiratory systemAnesthesiaPsychiatryComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Principi T, Coates AL, Parkin PC, et al. Effect of oxygen desaturations on subsequent medical visits in infants discharged from the emergency department with bronchiolitis [published online ahead of print February 29, 2016]. JAMA Pediatr. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0114Investigators from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada sought to determine if oxygen desaturations at home (unknown to parents) in previously healthy infants 6 weeks to 12 months of age who were discharged from the emergency department (ED) with bronchiolitis predict future unscheduled medical visits. Research nurses enrolled study participants who were diagnosed with bronchiolitis and deemed suitable for discharge from the ED. At enrollment, parents were given a pulse oximeter to take home with the child. Although the study pulse oximeters continuously recorded the oxygen saturation, they did not display saturation values and only alarmed for probe dislodgement. Prior to discharge from the ED, a pulse oximeter probe was applied to each study child and parents were taught how to reapply it. Parents were asked to record times of feeding, sleeping, and car seat use while the child was monitored. Parents were contacted 72 hours after discharge from the ED and asked about subsequent medical visits and hospitalizations.Following study completion, data from the pulse oximeters were analyzed using proprietary oximetry software which excluded artifacts and poor signal and generated the oximetry reports. A desaturation was defined as at least 1 oxygen saturation reading of <90% lasting at least 1 minute. Major desaturations were defined as 3 desaturations, or a reading of <90% for 3 minutes continuously or ≥10% of the total monitored time, including percentage of time with saturations 80%–89% and <80%. The primary outcome measure was an unscheduled visit for bronchiolitis within 72 hours of discharge; secondary outcomes included hospitalizations and all-cause medical visits. These outcomes were compared among infants with and without oxygen desaturations.Of the 118 participants, 64% (n = 75) had at least 1 desaturation during home monitoring. Of those with desaturations, 79% spent >1 minute with saturations ≤80%, 39% spent >1 minute with saturations ≤70%, and 53% experienced major desaturations. Most infants with desaturations (77%) experienced them during sleep or while feeding.There was no difference in unscheduled visits for bronchiolitis among infants with or without desaturations (24% vs 26%, respectively; P = .66). There was also no difference in rates of unscheduled visits between those with or without major desaturations. Rates of all-cause medical visits and hospitalizations also did not differ between infants with or without desaturations.The authors conclude that the majority of infants with mild bronchiolitis experienced desaturations at home, and that pulse oximetry does not predict return for care.Dr Garber has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.This is yet another study challenging the value of pulse oximetry in infants with bronchiolitis. Similar studies have been discussed in this journal (see AAP Grand Rounds, December 2014;32[6]:611 and December 2015;34[6]:642). In both of those prior studies the pulse oximeter display was altered to appear higher in the experimental groups, and patients in the experimental groups experienced fewer admissions and equivalent or better outcomes. The current study went further by not displaying any values and not alarming for low saturations. While this monitoring happened at home, the same desaturations occurring in the ED or the hospital may lead to admission or more interventions. Continuous pulse oximetry is more likely to detect these abnormalities and has been shown to be unnecessary for nonhypoxemic infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis.3Detection of transient desaturations without respiratory distress represents overdiagnosis – the identification of an abnormality where detection will not benefit, but may harm the patient.4 While chronic hypoxemia affects cognitive development, the authors of an accompanying editorial suggest that the evidence on the effects of chronic hypoxemia should not be extrapolated to previously healthy children with transient hypoxemia, and mention the difficulty in studying and preventing something as common as brief desaturations in healthy children.5 Perhaps the authors of the current and previous studies are teaching us not just about bronchiolitis but about human nature – once we have data, even clinically insignificant data, it is hard to ignore, and perhaps the best move in a happy nondistressed child with bronchiolitis is turning the oximeter off!It would also be prudent to recognize to whom these results do not apply based on the exclusion criteria used in the study: patients <6 weeks old, those with comorbidities (including prematurity of <36 weeks’ gestation), and/or infants with previous wheeze.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,604
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,187

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,293 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAAP Grand RoundsMême sujetRespiratory viral infections researchTravaux en français237 207