450. A Single Immunization With Optimized DNA Vaccines Protects Against Lethal Ebola Virus Challenge in Mice and Induces Seroconversion in Non-Human Primates Following a DNA Prime–DNA Boost Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ebola is a hemorrhagic fever virus that is responsible for the severe, ongoing outbreak in West Africa, with over 21000 confirmed cases and a mortality rate of >39%. Control of the outbreak has been a considerable challenge as there are no approved vaccines or therapies. Recent reports suggest that the outbreak is more severe than previously thought and investigating alternative immunization approaches would be of great benefit. We generated 3 DNA vector vaccine candidates expressing the Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV) glycoprotein (GP): 2 vaccines designed based on consensus sequences of EBOV GPs (1976-2014) and a 3rd matched construct to a 2014 Guinea strain. Immunogenicity and protection was first evaluated in mice, followed by studies in non-human primates (NHP). BALB/c mice received a single immunization of each DNA vaccine (40mg), delivered by intramuscular injection followed by electroporation (IM-EP). We also co-administered 2 or 3 construct formulations of DNA vaccines as an alternative strategy to broaden efficacy against antigenically distant EBOV strains. All 3 single and all co-formulated vaccines generated strong T cell responses, including GP-specific polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells secreting IFNγ, TNFα, and IL2. BALB/c mice (n=10/group) were challenged with a lethal dose of a heterologous mouse-adapted Mayinga 1976 EBOV strain. The two consensus DNA vaccines and 2 and 3 vaccine combinations were 100% protective in mice. The matched vaccine afforded 90% protection. Total GP-specific IgG levels were high in all surviving mice and low in unprotected animals suggesting that titers may correlate with therapeutic efficacy. As all 3 DNA vaccines were immunogenic and no antigen interference was observed, we next investigated immunogenicity of the 3 DNA vaccines in rhesus macaques following a DNA-DNA prime-boost immunization regimen. Macaques (n=5/group) received by IM-EP delivery:1) matched vaccine (4mg), 2) 3-construct formulation administered at a single injection site (2mg/vaccine), 3) 3-construct formulation delivered at separate injection sites (2mg/vaccine), or 4) 3-construct formulation combined with IL12 adjuvant (2mg/vaccine). Each immunization was followed by 3 subsequent DNA boosts at 1 month intervals. All groups had high GP-specific total IgG titers post-1st boost immunization that continued to increase over subsequent boosts and detectable T-cell responses. Overall, these studies demonstrate that a DNA-DNA prime-boost regimen can effectively induce seroconversion in NHPs and further studies will serve to evaluate protective immunogenicity. This approach not only serves as a tool to better understand the immune responses associated with protection against EBOV infection, but also has potential for translation towards human applications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».