MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2563163800 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.1372.1372

Clinical Proof of Concept Trial of Oral Ciclopirox Olamine in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancy

2012· article· en· W2563163800 sur OpenAlexaff
Mark D. Minden, Donna E. Hogge, Scott J. Weir, Jim Kasper, Lavonne Patton, Yulia Jitkova, Marcela Gronda, Rose Hurren, Lian Rajewski, Kevin Schorno, Hong Chang, Joseph Brandwein, Vikas Gupta, Andre C. Schuh, Suzanne Trudel, Karen Yee, Greg Reed, Aaron D. Schimmer

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNail Diseases and Treatments
Établissements canadiensOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British ColumbiaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCmaxHematologic malignancyDosingPharmacokineticsClinical trialPharmacologyInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Adverse effectOncologyGastroenterology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1372 Ciclopirox olamine (CPX) is a topical antifungal agent used for the treatment of mild to moderate nail infection. Recently, we and others demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo that CPX chelates intracellular iron and is preferentially cytotoxic to malignant cells including AML cells and stem cells over normal hematopoietic stem cells. To evaluate the clinical activity of this drug in patients with hematologic malignancy, we formulated CPX as an oral suspension in Ora-Sweet® and confirmed stability and purity. With this formulation, 97% bioavailabilty was demonstrated in male C57BL6 mice. Prior pharmacology and toxicology data for CPX related to its use as an anti-fungal was leveraged to receive regulatory approval for a first-in-patient phase I trial of escalating doses and frequencies of oral CPX in patients with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancy (NCT00990587). 23 patients (AML = 20, myelodysplasia = 2, myeloma = 1) were treated with oral CPX once daily – 5 days. In a 3+3 design, patients received escalating doses of CPX (5–80 mg/m2) over 5 dose levels. Cycles could be repeated every 21 days for patients who were stable or improving and 7 patients received more than one cycle (range 2–4). Pharmacokinetics-guided dose and dose frequency escalation was employed. Upon completion of the 80mg/m2 dose, the frequency was escalated to q.i.d according to predefined criteria to increase dosing frequency based on the half-life and Cmax. Once daily dosing of CPX was generally well tolerated except for one case of reversible Grade 3 knee pain possibly related to study drug that occurred in a patient with concomitant febrile neutropenia receiving 80 mg/m2 of CPX. A patient receiving 80 mg/m2 daily experienced an adverse event unrelated to study drug (febrile neutropenia) and did not complete all of the follow-up so was replaced with another patient. Dose limiting toxicity was observed at the 80mg/m2 q.i.d dose level with 2 of 5 patients experiencing Grade 3 small bowel enteritis. One patient at this dose level developed Grade 3 typhlitis that was initially classified as unrelated to study drug, but reassessed as possibly related in light of the subsequent cases of small bowel enteritis. Plasma concentrations of CPX and its glucuronide were measured by LC/MS/MS. Systemic drug exposure increased with increasing dose. At the 80mg/m2 dosage regimen Cmax and AUC(0–6 hrs) up to mean values of 221 ng/ml and 811 h*ng/mL, respectively, were observed. The terminal half- life of CPX at 80mg/m2 was 2.7 hours and the primary route of metabolism was glucuronidation. Cmax and AUC values for CPX glucuronide were 10–20 times higher than were the corresponding values for CPX at all doses. Pharmacodynamic studies evaluated the ability of CPX to repress survivin expression as we previously demonstrated changes in survivin expression after in vitro treatment of AML cells. Peripheral blood AML blasts from 15 study patients were isolated from the peripheral blood samples by magnetic bead separation before, during (d5), and after (d8) study drug treatment. Total mRNA was isolated and levels of survivin and 18S expression quantified by Q-RTPCR. Mean survivin mRNA expression on d5 of CPX administration was 30 ± 15, 21 ± 13, and 39± 29 percent of pretreatment expression after 20, 40, and 80 mg/m2 once daily dosing, respectively. No reduction in survivin expression was observed at lower doses. However, repression was transient, as levels returned towards baseline by day 8 (3 days off drug). While no patient had CR or CRp, hematologic improvement was observed in two study patients. A patient with acute panmyelosis receiving 20mg/m2 of CPX had a transient (90 day) decrease in marrow fibrosis and blasts count as well as improvement in the neutrophil and platelet counts. An AML patient with poor risk cytogenetics and progressive disease receiving 40 mg/m2 of CPX had transient (56 day) improvement in platelet count and reduction in leukemic blasts. In summary, an academic and not-for-profit partnership rapidly translated laboratory-based preclinical and mechanistic studies into a clinical proof of concept trial. Given the transient pharmacodynamic changes and signals of clinical response, further trials should focus on optimizing oral dosage regimens of oral CPX as a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. Disclosures: Schimmer: Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network: Named as an inventor on a patent application claiming the use of ciclopirox olamine in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of AML Other; Biotheryx: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetNail Diseases and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207