"Post-Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome" after a First Episode of PE: Results of the E.L.O.P.E. Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Most pulmonary embolism (PE) research has focused on acute and short-term outcomes such as mortality and PE recurrence. Whether long-term morbidity such as exercise limitation, impaired quality of life (QOL) and persistent dyspnea occurs after PE is largely unstudied. To address this knowledge gap, we performed the ELOPE study, a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of long-term outcomes after acute PE (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01174628). Objectives: The objectives of the ELOPE (Evaluation of Long-term Outcomes after PE) Study were: (1) to describe and quantify degree of exercise limitation, QOL impairment and persistent dyspnea at 1 year after PE; and (2) to identify predictors of poor functional status at 1 year. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with a 1st episode of acute PE diagnosed within the previous 10 days screened at 5 Canadian recruiting centers were potentially eligible to participate. Exclusion criteria were subsegmental-only PE, preexisting severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity, previous proximal DVT, contraindication to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), life expectancy <1 year, unable to read questionnaire in English and French or to attend follow-up visits, and unable or unwilling to consent. After the Baseline (B) visit, patients attended follow-up (FU) visits at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months to measure QOL (SF-36, PEmbQoL), dyspnea (UCSD SOBQ), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) [all FU visits]; undergo CTPA [B, 12], echocardiogram [B, 12], Q scan [6, 12], cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) [1, 12] and pulmonary function tests [1, 12]; and measure biomarkers (BNP, ddimer, troponin) [B, 6]. The primary study outcome was maximal aerobic capacity defined by peak oxygen uptake (VO2) as a percent of predicted maximal VO2 (VO2max) on 1-year CPET, with <80% predicted VO2max considered abnormal, as per American Thoracic Society guidelines. For the present analysis, we summarized demographic and clinical characteristics of study subjects, the proportion of patients with VO2max <80% predicted on 1 year CPET (primary outcome), and compared mean QOL and dyspnea scores in patients with vs. without the primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were done to identify demographic, clinical and functional predictors of abnormal VO2max at 1 year, with adjustment for relevant confounding variables. Results: 984 patients were screened for participation; of these, 150 were eligible and 100 (67%) consented to participate. Mean (SD) age was 50 (15) years, 57% were male, 80% were outpatients and 33% had concomitant DVT. PE was provoked in 21% and unprovoked in 79%; none were cancer-related. At 1 year, 40/86 (46.5%) of patients had <80% predicted VO2max on CPET; these patients had worse 1-year SF-36 MCS (mental) (p=0.002) and PCS (physical) (p=0.009) scores, PEmbQoL scores (p=0.002) and SOBQ scores (p=0.003), compared to patients with >80% predicted VO2max at 1 year. Independent baseline predictors of abnormal VO2max at 1 year included: male sex (relative risk (RR)= 3.2 [95% CI 1.3-8.1]; p=0.015), age (RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.96-0.99] per 1 year age increase; p=0.002), BMI (RR 1.1 [95% CI 1.01-1.2] per 1 kg/m2 BMI increase; p=0.023), and smoker (RR 1.8 [95% CI 1.1-2.9]; p=0.023). In addition, VO2max <80% predicted at 1 month and 6MWT distance at 1 month were significantly associated with risk of abnormal VO2max at 1 year (RR 3.8 [95% CI 1.9-7.2; p<0.0005] and RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.7-0.9; p=0.001] per 30m increased walking distance, respectively). Inpatient status at enrolment, previous lung disease, unprovoked vs. provoked PE, concurrent DVT, and number of days with symptoms before PE diagnosis did not influence VO2max at 1 year. Conclusions: PE is a common and serious cardiovascular illness, yet clinically relevant information on characteristics and determinants of long-term outcome after PE have been lacking. Results of the ELOPE Study indicate that almost half of PE patients can be considered to have a "post-PE syndrome" characterized by exercise limitation at 1 year, which influences their QOL and degree of dyspnea. Predictors of this post-PE syndrome include male sex, younger age, higher BMI and smoking. CPET testing or 6MWT testing at 1 month may help to identify patients with a higher risk of post-PE syndrome at 1 year. Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-93627) Disclosures Wells: Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».