MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2563788622 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.532.532

Impact of Minimal Residual Disease at Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation In Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia In Remission: a Study on Behalf of Eurocord-EBMT and EBMT-PDWP

2010· article· en· W2563788622 sur OpenAlexaff
Annalisa Ruggeri, Gérard Michel, Jean‐Hugues Dalle, Maurizio Caniglia, António Campos, Cristina Díaz de Heredia, Mohamad Mohty, José María Pérez Hurtado, Marc Bierings, Henrique Bittencourt, Marcos Augusto Mauad, Duncan Purtill, Nabil Kabbara, Christina Peters, Éliane Gluckman, Myriam Labopin, Franco Locatelli, Vanderson Rocha

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMinimal residual diseaseInternal medicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationOncologyCumulative incidenceCord bloodLeukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 532 Intensive and risk-adapted chemotherapy protocols may cure more than 80% of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The detection of a positive minimal residual disease (MRD) in childhood ALL, is an independent prognostic factor of poor outcomes after chemotherapy treatment and has been used recently as a tool for risk stratification in most ALL treatment protocols. Its value before allogeneic related or unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been described in small series of patients and it has been associated with outcomes. With the aim to investigate the prognostic significance of MRD before unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) for ALL, we retrospectively analyzed children reported to the Eurocord registry. From 2000 to 2009, 316 children and adolescents with ALL in remission underwent a first single UCBT after a myeloablative conditioning regimen in 38 EBMT centers. Among these patients, 170 had an assessment of MRD before UCBT and were considered in this analysis. Of those, 72 patients underwent UCBT in first complete remission (CR), 77 in CR2 and 21 in CR3. The MRD assay was based on PCR (71%) or multiparameter flow cytometric analysis (FC) (29%). A positive MRD was defined according to treatment protocols of the various participating centers. MRD test before UCBT was positive (MRD+) in 74 patients (44%) and negative (MRD-) in 96 (56%). MRD was positive in 32 out of 72 patients in CR1, 31 out of 77 patients in CR2 and 11 out of 21 patients in CR3. The median interval from the last MRD test to UCBT was 18 days (12-42 days). The median follow-up was 46 months (4-104 months) and the median age at UCBT was 6.5 years (0.6-17 years). The most common immunephenotype was B-cell precursor ALL (83%). Of 72 patients transplanted in CR1, 56% had poor risk cytogenetics (t4;11 or t9;22). For patients in CR2 and CR3, the median interval between remission to relapse was 22 months (3-130 months). All patients received a TBI-based (63%) or Busulfan-based (37%), myeloablative conditioning regimen. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin (CSA) ± steroids in 75%. Sixty percent of cord blood units had 0–1 HLA mismatches with recipients and 40% had 2–3 mismatches (antigen level for HLA-A and B, allelic level for DRB1). Median infused TNC cell dose was 4.8 ×107/kg (1.30-18×107/kg) and median CD34+ was 1.8× 105/kg (1-10×105/kg). Cumulative incidence (CI) of day-60 neutrophil recovery (>500 mm3) and grade II-IV acute GVHD were 85±3% and 26±4%, respectively. Fifty-eight patients developed acute GVHD (grade 2, n=39, grade 3, n=14, grade 4, n= 5). The overall incidence of cGVHD was 17% at 4 years. Twenty-four patients had chronic GVHD (limited involvement, n=15, extensive disease, n=9). Overall CI of non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI) and probability of leukemia free survival (LFS) at 4 years were 22±3%, 30±3%, and 44±4, respectively. In a univariate analysis, CI of NRM, RI and LFS at 4 years were 26±5%, 39±6%, and 29±5% in children with MRD+ and 20±4%, 24±3% and 54±5% in children with MRD- (p=0.08, p=0.05, p=0.006) respectively. In a multivariate analysis adjusted, a positive MRD before UCBT was an independent factor statistically associated with higher RI and decreased LFS (RI, HR=2.15, p=0.01, LFS, HR=1.97, p=0.003) (Figure 1). Also patients transplanted in more advanced status of disease at UCBT had higher RI and decreased LFS (RI, HR=4.25, p=0.002, LFS, HR=3.7, p=<0.0001); in fact, 4 years LFS was 56±6% for patients in CR1, 44±5% for patients in CR2 and 14±7% for patients in CR3 (p=<0.0001). Eighty-one patients died, causes of death were infections or other transplantation related events (n= 47) and disease progression (n= 34). The assessment of MRD in childhood ALL, is a powerful tool for predicting post transplant outcomes after UCBT. Approaches that can decrease relapse incidence in children with a positive MRD, such as better disease control before UCBT, rapid withdrawal of immunossupression, cell based immunotherapy or use of double cord blood transplantation, should be further investigated in order to improve final outcomes. Estimated 4-year Leukemia free Survival according to MRD status before UCBT [(••• MRD negative) (— MRD positive)] Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207