MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2563958277 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.284.284

Self-Enforcing Feedback Activation Between BCL6 and Tonic Pre-B Cell Receptor Signaling in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2014· article· en· W2563958277 sur OpenAlexaff
Huimin Geng, Christian Hurtz, Dirk Baumjohann, Zhengshan Chen, Wei‐Yi Chen, Erica Ballabio, Gang Xiao, Jae Woong Lee, Anne Deucher, Zhongxia Qi, Chuanxin Huang, Rahul Nahar, Soo-Mi Kweon, Seyedmehdi Shojaee, Lai N. Chan, Jingwei Yu, Jeffrey Tyner, Bill H. Chang, Steven M. Kornblau, Janet J. Bijl, B. Hilda Ye, Elisabeth Paietta, Ari Melnick, Robert G. Roeder, Stephen P. Hunger, Mignon L. Loh, Thomas A. Milne, Markus Müschen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensUniversité de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésbreakpoint cluster regionBCL6Cancer researchB-cell receptorBiologySignal transductionB cellPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayTranscription factorCell biologyImmunologyReceptorGeneticsGerminal centerAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background and hypothesis: Like mature B cell lymphoma, pre-B ALL originates from B cell precursors that critically depend on survival signals emanating from a functional (pre-) B cell receptor (BCR). While recent work successfully introduced BCR signaling inhibitors into patient care for various subtypes of mature B cell lymphoma, it is not known whether pre-BCR signaling represents a therapeutic target in pre-B ALL and in which cytogenetic subsets targeting of pre-BCR signaling will be effective. In this study we demonstrated that ALL can be subdivided into two groups that fundamentally differ with respect to pre-BCR signalling. We identified a novel mechanism of self-enforcing feedback activation between the transcription factor BCL6 and tonic pre-BCR signaling in pre-BCR+ ALL and proposed a dual targeting strategy of both BCL6 and pre-BCR related tyrosine kinases for the treatment of patients with pre-BCR+ ALL. Results: Flow cytometry analysis of surface pre-BCR expression (λ5, VpreB), cytoplasmic μ heavy chain (μHC) expression and intracellular Ca2+ signal in 29 patient-derived pre-B ALL xenograft samples and cell lines showed pre-BCR expression and activity in a subset of pre-B ALL, including all TCF3-PBX1 cases studied (n=4) and two cases with deletions at 6q21. Studying 830 pre-B ALL cases from four clinical trials (MDACC, St. Jude, COG P9906 and ECOG E2993), tonic pre-BCR signaling and constitutive PI3K-AKT activation was found in 112 cases (13.5%), including 93% TCF3-PBX1 (53 of 57), del (6)(q21) (7 of 7), PBX1 (1q23) duplication (4 of 4), MLL-rearrangement (3 of 86), hyperdiploid (2 of 43) and other (43 of 406) pre-B ALL cases. In other major ALL subtypes, we found no evidence for pre-BCR expression and activity, including BCR-ABL1 (0 of 196) and ETV6-RUNX1 (0 of 31). We found frequent 1q23 (PBX1) duplication, TCF3-PBX1 or other PBX1-rearrangement, 6q21 (PRDM1) deletion in ALL cells with tonic pre-BCR signaling. Development of a genetic mouse model for inducible ablation of Bcl6. Pre-BCR-induced activation of BCL6 relieves PRDM1-mediated repression of pre-BCR signaling components and positively regulates pre-BCR signaling output at the transcriptional level. The clinical data (COG P9906, ECOG E2993) revealed that high mRNA levels of BCL6 at the time of diagnosis is predictive of poor clinical outcome specifically in patients with pre-BCR+ ALL but not ALL cells lacking pre-BCR expression. These findings suggest an important role of BCL6 as a cofactor of pre-BCR signaling in a large subset of ALL. To directly test the role of Bcl6- and pre-BCR interactions, we generated a novel mouse model for inducible Cre-mediated deletion of Bcl6 exons 5-10, flanked by loxP sites. For lineage-specific deletion in vivo, we crossed these mice with an Mb1-Cre deleter strain, in which Bcl6 was deleted in pro-B cells, resulting in a differentiation block at the pre-B cell stage. Deletion of Bcl6 in mouse pre-BCR+ ALL and expression of a dominate-negative form of BCL6 in human primary pre-BCR+ALL cells, both rapidly induced cell death, indicating BCL6 cooperates with the pre-BCR in leukemic transformation. Cooperation between pre-BCR and BCL6 signaling. Inhibition of BCL6 via the specific BCL6 inhibitor RI-BPI showed compromised colony formation and induced cell cycle arrest. Interestingly, constitutive BCL6 expression was sensitive to inhibition of SYK and SRC tyrosine kinases downstream of the pre-BCR. Treating 6 pre-BCR+ and 8 pre-BCR- patient-derived ALL samples with the SYK inhibitor (PRT06207), BTK inhibitor (Ibrutinib) or a broader SRC and BTK inhibitor Dasatinib, we observed remarkably decreased BCL6 expression and increased apoptosis in pre-BCR+ but not pre-BCR- ALL cells. In vivo treatments with Dasatinib prevented leukemia initiation and significantly prolonged survival of the recipient mice that were injected with primary pre-BCR+ ALL cells, compared to non-treatment or Nilotinib-treatment. These data demonstrate that both inhibition of BCL6 and pre-BCR signaling selectively killed patient-derived pre-BCR+ ALL cells. Conclusions: Our study identified two distinct subtypes of pre-B ALL that fundamentally differ with respect to pre-BCR signaling. Tonic pre-BCR signaling engages a BCL6-dependent, self-enforcing amplification loop. Based on these findings, we propose a dual targeting strategy of BCL6 and pre-BCR tyrosine kinases for the treatment of patients with pre-BCR+ALL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207