Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) Improves Survival in Acute Biphenotypic (ABL) and Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia (AUL): A Single Centre Experience.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: ABL and AUL are associated with an unfavourable outcome for patients (pts) treated with standard-dose therapy alone. Although high-dose therapy has been used successfully in this population, the optimal management of pts with ABL/AUL remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective review was performed involving 24 adult pts with ABL or AUL who were treated in Vancouver between 1984 and 2006. Kaplan-Meier estimates were utilized for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OAS) and a multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors predictive of outcome. Characteristics: Utilizing the WHO criteria, 18 pts had ABL and 6 pts had AUL. There were 17 males and 7 females with a median age of 37 (range 22–75) years. Median white cell count (WCC) at presentation was 10.1 × 109(range: 0.9–196 × 109)/L. Seven pts had poor-risk karyotypes (3 pts complex, 3 pts with t(9,22), 2 pts with11q23 rearrangement, and 1 pt with monosomy 7),12 pts had standard-risk karyotypes, and 5 pts had an unknown karyotype. Induction chemotherapy consisted of Cytosine arabinoside (3–6/m2/day), Daunorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone with one pt with t(9,22) also having received Imatinib Mesylate. Thirteen pts went on to receive high-dose therapy and SCT. Stem cell source was autologous in 3 pts (all with AUL) or a related (6 pts) or an unrelated donor (4 pts). Eight of 10 pts were in complete remission at the time of SCT, one was in relapse and one had primary refractory ABL. Conditioning was TBI-based in 10 pts and Busulfan-based in 3 pts. Results: EFS and OAS estimates for all 24 patients at 3 years were 25% (95% CI 13%–50%) and 32% (95% CI 17%–58%), respectively. The non-relapse mortality (NRM) for the whole group at 3 years was 43% (95%CI 15%–61%). On multivariate analysis, when compared to pts receiving only standard-dose chemotherapy, pts who underwent high-dose therapy had significantly improved EFS [39% (95% CI 19%–77%) vs. 9% (95% CI 1%–59%), p=.03] and OAS [46% (95% CI 26%–83%) vs.14% (95% CI 3–74%), p=0.01], respectively. Age, WCC at presentation and cytogenetic risk group were not found to significantly influence outcome. Conclusion: Although patient numbers are limited, this experience would suggest that patients with ABL/AUL who achieve complete remission with standard chemotherapy should be considered for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. This approach provides them with the greatest probability of long-term event- free and overall survival.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».