MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2564661908 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.111.111

Genetic Alterations of Gα13 Signaling Pathway with BCL2 over-Expression Confers Lymphoma Dissemination and Inferior Outcome in Germinal Center B Cell Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

2015· article· en· W2564661908 sur OpenAlexaff
Daisuke Ennishi, Anja Mottok, Hennady P. Shulha, Pedro Farinha, Fong Chun Chan, Barbara Meissner, Merrill Boyle, Susana Ben‐Neriah, Christoffer Hother, Robert Kridel, Ryan D. Morin, Marco A. Marra, Kerry J. Savage, Laurie H. Sehn, Joseph M. Connors, Christian Steidl, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreSimon Fraser UniversityBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaGerminal centerBiologyBCL6Cancer researchFollicular lymphomaGene expression profilingLymphomaGeneticsB cellGeneImmunologyGene expression

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is divided into two distinct molecular subtypes, germinal center B cell (GCB) subtype and activated B cell (ABC) subtype. Genetic landscape studies of DLBCL have revealed several GCB-DLBCL specific mutations, including CREBBP, GNA13, EZH2, TNFRSF14, BCL2 and MEF2B. Functional studies have recently shown that the inactivation of Gα13 signaling pathway genes, including GNA13, together with BCL2 over-expression, allows GC B-cells to escape the germinal center niche and widely disseminate. Although these findings revealed a critical role of genetic alterations of Gα13 signaling pathway in GC-driven mouse models of lymphomagenesis, clinical correlation is lacking. Here we analyzed the clinical impact of genetic alterations of Gα13 signaling pathway in a large population-based DLBCL cohort. Methods: We analyzed 347 newly diagnosed de novo DLBCL cases that were uniformly treated with R-CHOP at the BC Cancer Agency. Comprehensive clinical annotation was available through the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database. Deep targeted re-sequencing of the coding exons of GNA13, P2RY8, ARHGEF1, S1PR2 and RHOA was performed using a Truseq Custom Amplicon assay (Illumina) and/or Fluidigm Access Array chips. High-resolution copy number analyses were performed using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays. Immunohistochemical staining and break-apart FISH assays for MYC and BCL2 were performed on tissue microarrays (n=332). Cell-of-origin classification was available in 331 cases, according to gene expression profiling by the Lymph2Cx assay using the NanoString platform (Scott, Blood 2014; 123) in 299 patients and the Hans algorithm (Hans, Blood 2004; 103) in 32 cases with low tumor content (<40%). Results: Using next generation sequencing, 225 SNVs and 5 Indels were detected in GNA13 (16%), P2RY8 (18%), ARHGEF1 (6%), S1PR2 (3%) and RHOA (6%). SNP 6.0 microarrays revealed heterozygous deletions in GNA13 (2%), ARHGEF1 (1%), S1PR2 (4%) and RHOA (8%), but homozygous deletion was not found in any of these five loci. GNA13, P2RY8 and ARHGEF1 mutations were significantly more frequent in the GCB subtype than ABC subtype (26% vs. 6%; p<.0001, 25% vs 7%; p=.0002, and 8% vs. 5%; p=.008, respectively). 185 GCB-DLBCL cases were further analyzed for clinical correlations. In the cases with mutations of any of the five Gα13 signaling pathway genes, BCL2 over-expression (cut off; 50%) and translocation was associated with increasing stage (p=.018 and p=.005, respectively), but not in wt cases (p=.53 and p=.63, respectively). Specifically, in the cases with GNA13 and P2RY8 mutations individually, BCL2 over-expression was associated with advanced stage (stage III/IV, p=.018 and p=.037, respectively), but not in wild type (wt) cases. Importantly, BCL2 over-expression in the cases harboring Gα13 pathway mutations was not significantly associated with other poor risk features, including any other IPI factors or bone marrow involvement, indicating that genetic alterations in Gα13 signaling pathway accompanied by BCL2 over-expression might promote lymphoma dissemination into lymph nodes but not extranodal sites. With a median follow up of 6.5 years for living patients, there was no prognostic impact of harboring any isolated Gα13 pathway mutation in GCB-DLBCL patients. However, in cases with any Gα13 pathway mutations, BCL2 over-expression was significantly associated with an inferior 5y-time to progression (TTP; 90% vs 62%, p=.003) and disease-specific survival (DSS; 90% vs 71%, p=.042), but not in wt cases (Fig 1). In a Cox model of TTP including the IPI, BCL2 over-expression remained prognostic in the cases harboring any Gα13 pathway mutations (HR=4.13 [1.42-12.01], p=.009), but not in wt cases (HR=1.70 [0.62-4.68], p=.31). In cases with any Gα13 pathway alterations including copy number loss, BCL2 over-expression was also significantly associated with an inferior TTP (HR=3.64 [1.39-9.57], p=.009) independent of IPI, but not in the cases without genetic alterations (HR=1.75 [0.57-5.34], p=.33). Conclusions: Genetic alterations in Gα13 signaling pathway genes cooperate with BCL2 over-expression to promotes lymphoma dissemination to nodal sites and is associated with the poor outcome in GCB-DLBCL Figure 1. TTP and DSS according to BCL2 over-expression with/without Gα13 signaling pathway mutations in GCB-DLBCL patients (n=185) treated with R-CHOP Figure 1. TTP and DSS according to BCL2 over-expression with/without Gα13 signaling pathway mutations in GCB-DLBCL patients (n=185) treated with R-CHOP Disclosures Savage: Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Infinity: Honoraria; Roche: Other: Institutional research funding. Connors:Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Inventor on a patent that NanoString has licensed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→