<i>Remaking the British Atlantic: The United States and the British Empire after American Independence</i>, by P.J. Marshall
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Remaking the British Atlantic. The United States and the British Empire after American Independence, by P.J. Marshall. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. viii, 335 pp. $65.00 US (cloth). In the aftermath of the American Revolution, Britain and the fledgling United States diverged sharply politically even as their cultures, economies, and societies drew them ever closer. These seemingly contradictory trends form the basis of P.J. Marshall's important new book, Remaking the British Atlantic. Among the first rank of British imperial historians, Marshall long specialized in the history of British India before turning to the interconnections between that historiography and that of the British Atlantic in this book's predecessor, The Making and Unmaking o[Empires (Oxford, 2005). As befits its title, the outlook of Remaking the British Atlantic is both British and Atlanticist, drawing diverse transoceanic connections between British, American, Caribbean, and Canadian history. While the book occasionally hits an errant note, especially in its analysis of the latter three historiographies, it is undoubtedly a magnificent achievement. In the opening section, Marshall emphasizes the estrangement of the two countries in politics, press, and public opinion. Even when support for the American war dwindled in Britain, there was little sympathy for America, no enthusiasm for its political programs, no interest in concessions, and a general dislike of American manners, political culture, and leadership. To Americans, meanwhile, Britain was a seething pit of hierarchy, corruption, and militarization that was widely perceived as actively seeking to foment rebellion in America. The 1783 treaty ending the war --incomplete, unenforceable and never properly fulfilled served only to generate resentment rather than promote reconciliation. Marshall's characterization of the two countries may not be entirely novel, but it is incisive, thoroughly convincing, and laced with innumerable fascinating details. Perhaps more intriguingly, Marshall next disputes the familiar (if far from universally accepted) narrative of the loss of America causing a swing to the east towards India. He persuasively shows that despite views of West Indians as truculent and somewhat suspicious, the Atlantic remained central to British imperial policy until the mid-nineteenth century, as abolitionists confidently supposed plantations would flourish under free labour. Britain's government also tenuously explored adventures against Spain in Florida and the Mosquito Coast, and there were initially expansive plans for the agricultural development of the remnants of British North America, though these latter schemes soon faltered. Despite the political separation of the two countries and the mutual dislike among their populace, Marshall ably shows in the second section how they remained closely tied at multiple levels economically, socially, and culturally. Although the 1780s saw British policymakers unilaterally restrict American commercial activities in several major markets, notably the West Indies and the Atlantic fisheries, American shipbuilding nonetheless revived, the US opened up trade to Asia, and direct trade blossomed. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».