HEAD-NECK TAPER CORROSION OF ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary Corrosion and fretting damage at the head-neck interface of artificial hip joints is more severe with larger head sizes. This is a concern, as the release of metal particles and ions can cause adverse tissue reactions, similar to those observed high wear metal-on-metal articulations. Introduction In the last few years corrosion was increasingly observed at head-neck interfaces of artificial hip joints, especially in joints with larger heads. There has always been evidence of some corrosion at modular junctions of artificial joints, but except for few designs, it was not seen as a real problem. It is important to better understand the factors contributing to corrosion at modular interfaces, so that necessary improvements can be made to minimise or completely avoid corrosion, in order to avoid possible adverse tissue reactions. Methods Over 100 retrieved stems and heads of 28, 32, 36, 40 and larger heads with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) and metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations were scored for corrosion and fretting damage, in order to get a better picture of the magnitude of the problem. For some of the head sizes it was possible to assess the fretting and corrosion damage separately from implants from two different manufacturers. The tapers of the stem and head were subdivided into eight regions each, and scored for the severity of fretting and corrosion damage, as well as of the affected area within each sub-section. The scoring was undertaken by three persons with a fair intraclass correlation. The fretting and corrosion scores were also assessed based on the location of the center of the head with respect to the center of the taper. The distance between these two centers influences the toggling motion between the head and neck, as the main load is about 30 degrees out of axis during walking and other activities of daily living. Results It was found that head-neck interfaces of two manufacturers of 36mm heads had significantly more corrosion than 28mm heads. There is a significant relationship between head and neck fretting damage, and between corrosion and fretting damage. There is also more corrosion damage in 32, 40 and larger heads, but these groups were from different manufacturers, so that it was not possible to perform statistical tests. More corrosion was observed when the centre of the head was at a larger distance from the centre of the head, leading to an increased toggling moment due to the out-of-axis loading. Discussion It is of some concern that more corrosion is being observed with larger heads. Corrosion generally gets worse over time, which could negatively impact on the long-term behavior of these hip joints. Furthermore, it is possible that the metal particle and ion release due to corrosion and fretting could have adverse soft tissue reactions, similar to those observed at some MoM articulations. The fact that there are significant differences in the observed corrosion and fretting damage between the head-neck interfaces of two companies, indicates that even subtle changes in the geometry and the machined taper surface are important. A better understanding of these factors is required to make sure that the corrosion and fretting damage is minimised, or even better eliminated for all heads of artificial joints.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».