Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chapter 4 Working Towards a Standard ModelA rather neat way of posing the problem of lifting our exercise in functional research towards a better appreciation of the need for and presence, or absence, of an adequate standard model is to bring together two chapters of Lonergan's works: chapter seven of Insight, "Common Sense as Object" and chapter six of Method, "Research."We have brought those two chapters together already, indeed, though implicitly, in that functional research, about which Method hovers ineffectually, is part of the answer that emerged in 1965 to the problem of Cosmopolis posed at the end of chapter seven of Insight.It would be good to add to this a messy but slowly illuminating pause over the word as in the title of the Insight chapter, and pull in Lonergan's reflections, in Phenomenology and Logic, on the meaning and significance of the phrase subject-as-subject. 1 The messing is directed providentially for me, and so for you, by the challenge of commenting on four submissions to our project that I am trying to handle today.The four submissions are in the order mentioned in the e-mail that I quote immediately, sent to the four.The e-mail is an illustration of the fuller collaboration required by our project within this seeding of the full effective global functional collaboration.What we are finding is that the question, 'What is Functional Research?' cannot be isolated from the full question of the functional structure indicated by Lonergan in 1969 (eventually appearing as chapter 5 of Method in Theology).But let me get into the messing first, which begins with my e-mail to the group.Notice, as best you can what is going-on.2 The messing anticipates the emergence of precise conversations of all of us, linked together by diagrams that have yet to emerge, but the dominant diagram 1 See the index in that volume, under Subject, near the end.I do not pause much over this text here, but it haunts our search here for its word, HOW.2 "Noticing what is going on" in its innovative fullness is a task of the third specialty, boosted to creativity by the inflow from research that is lifted to what-answerings by the second specialty.The functional researchers' task is to select, refine and channel on to interpreters, neatly and effectively, in microspurts rather than in a hose-ups, what is noted.In the full culture of the standard model I would not have to note for you that Notice at the beginning of the sentence to which this note refers had/has all those meanings for you.In almost all submissions regarding anomalies, including the four great contributions talked of here, there inclines to be a hose-up.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,021 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,025 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».