MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2565923193 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.1346.1346

Population-Based Study of the Outcomes of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) In the Era of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT)

2010· article· en· W2565923193 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Carolyn Owen, Andrew Daly, Neil Chua, Douglas A. Stewart

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePrimary central nervous system lymphomaAutologous stem-cell transplantationDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaOncologyRadiation therapyLymphomaInternal medicineTransplantationPopulationFollicular lymphomaCancer registrySurgeryCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1346 Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extra-nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Outcomes for PCNSL are generally reported to be dismal and the standard of care for treatment remains unclear due to a lack of randomized studies. However, recent studies have demonstrated that intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is effective as salvage therapy and provides encouraging results as a part of primary therapy. In Alberta, PCNSL is treated exclusively in 2 centres. As one centre adopted ASCT for PCNSL later, we were able to compare the outcomes for patients treated with a strategy including ASCT versus a radiotherapy (RT)-based treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of all patients diagnosed with PCNSL in Alberta from 1998–2008 to determine the ‘real world’ outcomes for this disease. Methodology: Cases of PCNSL were obtained from the Alberta Cancer Board Cancer Registry. Charts were manually reviewed and data extracted on clinical characteristics, treatment, response, toxicities, relapse and survival. Results: Data was obtained for 95 patients (median age 61) with pathology-confirmed PCNSL of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-type. Two additional cases with non-DLBCL pathology were excluded from analysis (2 cases with epidural follicular lymphoma and 1 case of marginal zone lymphoma). Eight additional patients were diagnosed with PCNSL by radiology, without pathological confirmation. These patients had a median age of 80 and were uniformly palliated without chemotherapy or RT and were excluded from evaluation. Nine (9.5%) patients were HIV+, of whom 4 were treated with radiotherapy (2 with resultant long-term survival) and 5 were palliated. Of the HIV- patients, 15 (17%) were treated with palliation alone. These patients had a median age of 70 and only 1 had an ECOG ≤ 1. Twenty-seven patients (34%) were treated with RT alone at a median of 4500cGy. These patients had a median age of 68 and 67% had an ECOG ≥2 at diagnosis. The mean overall survival (OS) for this group was 12 months, similar to previous reports and their 5 year OS was 15%. Forty-four patients (46%) were treated with curative intent with therapy including at least one cycle of high-dose methotrexate (HDM). These patients had a median age of 56 and 61% had an ECOG ≥2 at diagnosis. The complete remission (CR) rate, including unconfirmed CR (CRu) was 42%, 38% achieved a partial remission (PR) and 16% were refractory to HDM. Six (13%) received ≤ 3 cycles of HDM, with 2 (4%) early toxic deaths, 2 refractory disease and 2 discontinuations for toxicity. Sixteen (36%) were treated with HDM alone with 14 of these patients receiving ≥ 4 cycles of HDM. Eight patients (18%) were treated with a combination of HDM and RT of which 2 were due to early discontinuation of HDM for progressive disease (1) and toxicity (1). No survival difference was observed for patients treated with HDM alone compared to combined HDM and RT. The median OS for the HDM-treated patients not receiving ASCT as a part of initial therapy was 31 months. Patients <70yrs without major organ dysfunction were offered ASCT if they did not achieve a CR with HDM or later relapsed. All but 3 ASCTs were performed following thiotepa, busulfan and cyclophosphamide (TBC) conditioning. Long-term event-free survival post-ASCT was seen in 11 of 18 patients transplanted in first partial remission, 1 of 3 for patients transplanted for primary refractory/progressive disease, and 5 of 6 patients transplanted for relapsed disease. Three patients died early of transplant-related mortality (TRM). The 5 yr OS of all HIV- PCNSL patients, excluding those receiving only palliation was 37% while the 5 yr OS for patients with PCNSL who received an ASCT (at any time) was 66%. Patients ≤ 65, patients who received an ASCT at any time had a significantly improved survival (5 yr OS 70%) compared to those who did not (5 yr OS 20%). (p=0.009) Conclusion: ASCT with TBC conditioning is an effective therapy for PCNSL both as a part of primary therapy and for relapsed disease. However, TBC/ASCT is associated with high TRM so efforts should be made to optimize ASCT conditioning to reduce toxicity and make this effective treatment available to more PCNSL patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,102
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,204

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207