Control of Platelet Fibronectin Internalization and Cell Surface Retention by Fibrinogen: Lessons from Hypofibrinogemic Patients.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Although fibrinogen (Fg) has been considered essential for platelet aggregation, we previously demonstrated that thrombi still formed in Fg-deficient mice. In these animals, platelet fibronectin (Fn) content is increased >3 fold, suggesting that Fn may play a role in thrombosis and hemostasis. However, it is unclear whether Fg controls human platelet Fn internalization. We recently identified severely hypofibrinogenaemic patient born from a consanguineous marriage (Xu X et al. Thromb and Haemost2006; 95: 931–5). The patient and his father had respective plasma Fg levels of 1.7mg/dL (approximately 20 times less than the normal level) and 10.5 mg/dL. We examined the platelet Fn content of the patient, his parents, and healthy donors by immuno-electron microscopy (IEM), western blot, and flow cytometry (FACS) using a rabbit anti-human Fn-specific antibody (Sigma, USA). Significant increase of patient platelet Fn content was detected by all three methods, in which mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the patient’s platelet Fn by FACS was 3-fold higher than healthy donors. No concomitant alteration of platelet thrombospondin-1 and vitronectin was detected. These data are consistent with our observations in animal models. To examine the role of platelet Fn content in platelet aggregation, we isolated human platelets via sepharose 2B gel filtration. Cell surface Fn expression after thrombin stimulation was examined by FACS. Surprisingly, although platelet Fn was increased, cell surface Fn was not increased. Rather, surface Fn was approximately 6-fold less than that of his father and 10-fold less than healthy donors. Using ELISA, we observed that the patient’s platelet Fn was mainly released into the extracellular medium after thrombin treatment since the supernantant contained 2–3 fold higher levels of Fn than that of healthy donors (472.8 ± 13 ng/mL versus 213.5 ±4.7 ng/mL). Since fibrin has been reported as a receptor of Fn on platelet surface, we tested the hypothesis that high expression of platelet surface Fn in healthy donors was due to fibrin formation on the platelet surface after thrombin treatment. Gel filtered platelets from healthy donors were treated with either thrombin or thrombin receptor activation peptide (TRAP, at 100μM). The latter is able to induce platelet Fg release but not fibrin formation. We found that fibrin was indeed expressed on the platelet surface after thrombin but not TRAP treatment, which were detected by both FACS and IEM with a monoclonal anti-fibrin specific antibody (clone T2G1, Accurate Bilchemicals, USA). Consistent with these data, Fn was only significantly detected on the surface after thrombin but not TRAP treatment (MFI = 10.9 ± 2.5 versus 1.3 ± 0.3). To the best of our knowledge, this is first report that thrombin converts platelet-released Fg to fibrin on the platelet surface. Our data also suggested that Fg not only controls platelet Fn internalization but also regulates platelet surface Fn retention by the fibrin-Fn interaction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».