MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2566911125 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.16.16

Engraftment Patterns in NOD.SCID Mice Predict Outcome in Human AML

2014· article· en· W2566911125 sur OpenAlexaff
James A. Kennedy, Amanda Mitchell, Weihsu Claire Chen, Liqing Jin, Stanley W.K. Ng, Liran I. Shlush, Sasan Zandi, Jessica McLeod, Andreea C. Popescu, Nathan Mbong, Andrea Arruda, Mark D. Minden, John E. Dick, Jean Wang

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCD33XenotransplantationMyeloidHaematopoiesisStem cellNodCD19BiologyTransplantationLeukemiaCancer researchCD34Myeloid leukemiaImmunologyFlow cytometrySevere combined immunodeficiencyImmunophenotypingMedicineIn vivoInternal medicineCell biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The NOD.SCID xenotransplantation assay is a key model system for interrogating the biology of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) in human acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approximately 50% of AMLs can generate human grafts in immunodeficient mice that recapitulate the features of the parent sample. However, some AML samples generate non-leukemic grafts upon xenotransplantation. We recently reported that multilineage (ML) grafts, comprised of both B-lymphoid and myeloid cells, are generated by preleukemic hematopoietic stem cells (preL-HSCs; Shlush et al. Nature 2014). PreL-HSCs contain a subset of the mutations present in leukemic blasts and have a competitive growth advantage over wildtype HSCs leading to clonal expansion in vivo, yet retain multilineage differentiation capacity. To investigate the relationship between patient outcomes and the biological properties of LSCs and preL-HSCs as reflected by different engraftment patterns, we transplanted 272 diagnostic patient samples, representing a broad cross-section of adult AML, into sublethally irradiated NOD.SCID mice by intrafemoral injection. Human chimerism was assessed 8-10 weeks post-transplant by flow cytometry. 41% of samples generated AML xenografts, defined as a human graft containing >90% myeloid (CD33+CD19-CD45+) cells. Three patterns of engraftment were seen with the remaining samples: no human graft, defined as <0.5% CD45+ cells (27%), isolated CD3+CD45+ T-cell (TC) grafts (10%), and ML human grafts composed of CD33+CD45+ myeloid cells plus >10% CD19+CD33-CD45+ B-cells (22%). Among patients whose samples generated ML grafts compared to AML grafts or TC/no graft, secondary AML was less common (10% vs. 27% vs. 26%, respectively; P=0.03). Associations between engraftment pattern and other baseline clinical characteristics, including age, white blood cell (WBC) count and cytogenetics, did not reach statistical significance in this cohort. However, there was a strong correlation between AML engraftment capacity and response to standard induction chemotherapy. AML engrafters had lower complete remission (CR) rates compared to all other patients as a group (51% vs. 81%; P<0.0001), and significantly decreased overall survival (OS; median 10.6 vs. 28.7 mos; P<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis of OS, AML engraftment capacity retained prognostic significance (hazard ratio (HR) 2.54; P<0.0001), along with established factors such as adverse cytogenetics (HR= 3.71; P<0.0001) and WBC count (HR= 1.005; P=0.001). The level of human leukemic engraftment achieved in mice also correlated with patient survival. In a median split analysis, OS was worse in patients whose cells generated AML grafts with high (>16.6%) vs. low (≤16.6%) levels of human chimerism (median OS of 8.2 vs. 14.5 mos; P=0.001). The ability of a diagnostic AML sample to generate ML xenografts likely reflects a high frequency of preL-HSCs, postulated to be a source for relapse. Indeed, despite comparable CR rates in patients whose samples generated ML vs. TC/no graft (85% vs. 77%; P=0.28), the relapse-free survival of ML engrafting patients was shorter (median of 19.3 vs. 50.2 months; P=0.04). The cumulative incidence time-to-relapse (TTR) of ML engrafters (median TTR 19.7 mos) was also less than that of patients whose samples generated TC/no graft (median TTR not reached; P=0.01) and comparable to that of AML engrafters (9.6 mos; P=0.11). Thus, the presence of significant numbers of preL-HSCs in diagnostic AML samples, as evidenced by the generation of ML xenografts, is associated with earlier relapse, consistent with our prior finding that preL-HSCs persist in remission and thus may serve as a reservoir for clonal evolution. Interestingly, despite the shorter time-to-relapse, the OS of patients whose samples generated ML grafts was comparable to those who generated TC/no grafts (median 30.4 vs. 27.1 mos, P=0.95), and significantly longer than those who generated AML grafts (10.6 mos; P<0.0001), suggesting that relapsed disease arising from preL-HSCs behaves similarly to de novo disease and responds well to re-induction. Thus, the NOD.SCID xenotransplantation model captures functional properties of LSCs and preL-HSCs that are clinically relevant, validating its use to study the biology of these disease-sustaining cell populations and evaluate novel AML therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→