Transfusion Trigger Trial for Functional Outcomes in Cardiovascular Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Fracture Repair (FOCUS): The Principal Results
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract LBA-6 Introduction: Red blood cell transfusion is commonly administered after surgery. It has been suggested that patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are especially vulnerable to anemia and may benefit from transfusion to higher hemoglobin levels. However, red blood cell transfusion is costly and associated with uncommon but clinically important adverse effects. Thus, the indications for red blood cell transfusion are controversial. The aim of this NHLBI-sponsored randomized clinical trial was to determine whether higher blood transfusion thresholds improve functional recovery and reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients who were 50 years of age or older, underwent surgery for hip fracture, had a history of or risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and had postoperative hemoglobin < 10 g/dL. We randomly allocated patients to a transfusion threshold of 10 g/dL, or to receive transfusion when anemia symptoms occurred; transfusion was permitted if hemoglobin was < 8 /g dL. The primary outcome was death or the inability to walk across a room without human assistance at 60-Day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included 60-Day follow-up mortality, fatigue, falls, readmission to the hospital, and function. Results: We enrolled 2016 patients from 47 medical centers in North America. The age of the subjects varied from 51-103; mean age was 81.6 and 24% were male. 82% had hypertension, 40% had coronary artery disease, 25% had diabetes mellitus and 18% had history of cancer. The mean hemoglobin concentration prior to randomization was 9.0 g/dL (standard deviation +/‐ 0.8). The hemoglobin concentration prior to transfusion in 10 /g dL group was 9.2 g/dL (standard deviation +/‐ 0.5) and in symptomatic group 7.9 g/dL (standard deviation +/‐ 0.5). 10g/dL arm was transfused median 2 units (interquartile range 1,2), while the symptomatic group was transfused median 0 units (interquartile range 0,1). In the 10 g/dL group 35% (40% men, 33% women) were dead or unable to walk without human assistance and for symptomatic group 35% (32% men, 35% women); odds ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.23; difference = 0.6%, 95% confidence interval = -3.6 to 4.8%. In the 10 g/dL group 7.6% were dead on 60-Day follow-up and for symptomatic group 6.5%; odds ratio = 1.19, 99% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.86; difference = 1.1%, 99% confidence interval = -1.8 to 4.1%. The frequency of readmission to the hospital, falls, and the fatigue score were similar between the transfusion groups. Conclusions: Symptomatic transfusion conserved blood and had no adverse effects on ability to walk, 60-Day follow-up mortality, falls, readmission rates, or fatigue in this high-risk group of elderly patients with underlying cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Disclosures: Magaziner: Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».