Legacy Effects of Long-term Manure Applications on Soil-derived Nitrous Oxide Emissions
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Termination of the manure application treatments at the Dixon long-term manure research site in Humboldt, Saskatchewan provided a unique opportunity to explore how a change in management regime to annual urea applications would affect nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions.My hypotheses were that long-term manure applications would produce a legacy (or priming) effect that would result in enhanced N2O emissions following the changeover to a more readily available nitrogen source and that this effect would be relatively short-lived.The impacts of long-term manure application and change in fertility management in the sub-humid prairies of Saskatchewan has not been investigated in great depth, this work provided an opportunity for greater insight into changes in N transformation and gaseous N loss from a manured agroecosystem.Nitrous oxide fluxes associated with the long-term manure and fertilizer application from the Dixon site were measured during a 37-month period (i.e., from May 2011 to June 2014).In addition, denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) was measured in a subset of the plots starting in June 2011 and continuing three times per year (i.e., prior to and after the spring fertilizer application and again in early fall).Treatment-induced N2O emissions for the various historical amendment treatments indicate that past management can result in considerable N being lost from the system as N2O.Indeed, summed over the three-year post-manure period (i.e., from fertilizer application in 2011 through the 2014 spring thaw), N2O-N losses accounted for 2% to 6% of the total applied fertilizer-N.Moreover, under environmental conditions that optimize denitrification, N2O-N losses can be even greater.For example, high DEAs coupled with warm moist soil conditions resulted in large N2O emission events following the spring 2013 fertilizer application and during the 2014 spring thaw.As a result, cumulative annual N2O-N losses in 2013/14 were much greater than those in previous yearswith emissions from the liquid swine manure (LSM)amended plots ranging from 3% to 15% of applied N.These data support my earlier hypothesis that long-term applications of manure-N canespecially at high application rates and following frequent application -produce a 'priming' effect that exacerbates N2O emission when a more available form of N (e.g., urea fertilizer) is applied to the soil.Moreover, this priming effect appears to be relatively long-livedpersisting in the soil more than four and a half years after the last manure application.In any given year, however, the impact of the priming effect on Without their guidance I wouldn't have been able to excel in my studies and research.I would also like to thank my committee members Drs.Diane Knight and Bobbi Helgason.Dr. Helgason was paramount to my understanding of the complicated world of soil microbes and the different methods of analysis.This extends to Sarah Kuzmicz of the soil micro-lab and AAFC who provided technical help, as well as laboratory analysis used in this study, and to Hannah Konschuh who filled in that role while Sarah was away on leave.They all provided the kindness and reassurance to keep me on track and focused to finish.I would also like to extend my thanks to the lab group in 5E19 (Darin, Frank, Mark, Sharon, Dwayne, and Amanda) as well as all the summer students (especially Nicolas and Zheng, Adam and Kelsey), who helped me complete my field and lab research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle