MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2567487626 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4768.4768

Incorporation of ANTI-HHV-8 Agents as Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of HIV-Associated Primary Effusion Lymphoma.

2009· article· en· W2567487626 sur OpenAlexaff
Laura M. Kuyper, Mark Hull, Peter Phillips, Julio Montaner, Heather A. Leitch

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueViral-associated cancers and disorders
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrimary effusion lymphomaMedicineLymphomaInternal medicinePleural effusionPopulationChemotherapySarcomaOncologyGastroenterologySurgeryPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4768 Background Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) which comprises 4% of all AIDS-related lymphomas. PEL has a predilection for body cavities, causing pleural and pericardial effusions and ascites, but may present as masses. EBV is present in PEL cells in 80% of cases, but HHV-8 infection in PEL cells is required for the diagnosis (dx). Historically, treatment encompassed approaches including intracavitary antiretroviral medications (ARV) or chemotherapeutic agents, single or multi-agent systemic chemotherapy, and systemic ARVs, but median survival in case series using these approaches was only 6 months (mo). Treatment with multi-agent chemotherapy and highly active ARV therapy (HAART) yields good outcome in other HIV-NHL with survival approaching that of the HIV-negative population, but gives unknown survival rates in PEL. Recent consideration has been given to targeted therapy directed against HHV-8 infection with antiviral agents, with encouraging outcomes reported in the literature, particularly the HHV-8 associated syndromes Kaposi Sarcoma (KS) and Multicentric Castleman's Disease. We report on 5 patients (pts) diagnosed with PEL and treated at St. Paul's Hospital, 2 of whom are receiving valganciclovir (VGCV) therapy directed against HHV-8 infection of PEL cells. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of pts with a tissue dx of PEL since 2004. PEL data was collected from the clinical charts and HIV-related data from the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (CFE) database. A literature search was performed to capture prior studies of anti-HHV-8 medications used to treat PEL. Results The median age at PEL diagnosis was 60 (range 48-68) years (y); gender was: male, n=4; and female, n=1. 2 pts had a history of KS. The median CD4 count at PEL dx was 230 (50-560) cells/ml, 1 pt had a CD4 count of 50 cells/ml and all others were ≥210 cells/ml; median HIV viral load (VL; reported in 4) was 81 (35-176,600) copies/ml. The median time from HIV dx to PEL dx was 6 (0-21) y and from initiation of HAART to PEL dx 1 (0-11) y. Clinical PEL presentation was: pleural effusions, n=4; pericardial effusion, n=2; ascites, n=1; associated mass, n=1; mass without effusions, n=1. PEL treatment was: CHOP + HAART, n=2; CHOP + HAART + VGCV, n=1; HAART + VGCF, n=1; supportive care, n=1. 2 pts receiving CHOP and HAART are both in complete remission (CR) at 8 and 57 months (mo) from PEL dx. 2 pts diagnosed since December 2008 are receiving VGCV and HAART, and 1 of these pts is receiving CHOP with good tolerance (the other pt declined cytotoxic chemotherapy). Of 3 pts receiving CHOP, there was 1 episode of febrile neutropenia (FN) in 1 pt and 5 episodes of FN and 3 clinical infections in a second pt. The same pt had profound anemia and thrombocytopenia requiring transfusion support; this pt did not receive VGCV. 1 pt receiving VGCV with HAART and CHOP required G-CSF support but did not develop FN or clinical infection. 1 pt presented with a poor performance status, received supportive care only and died within one mo of PEL dx; all others are alive at 4, 8, 14 and 57 months from PEL dx. A literature review identified 2 reports of pts with PEL receiving systemic cidofovir (CDFV) directed against HHV-8. One pt with a CD4 count of 72 cells/ml and an HIV-VL of 75,000 copies/ml received unspecified systemic chemotherapy, HAART and intravenous (IV) CDFV followed by VGCV and is in CR at 68 mo from PEL dx. A second pt with a CD4 of 498 cells/ml (HIV-VL not reported) received HAART, IV cidofovir and interferon and is in CR at 28 mo. Conclusions PEL treatment has focused on optimization of HIV control with HAART and lymphoma control with chemotherapy, however, antiviral medications as targeted therapy directed against HHV-8 infection of PEL cells may be used without undue toxicity and possibly with success. PEL generally involves latent HHV-8 infection, which is theoretically not susceptible to antiviral medications, but there are reports in the literature of encouraging results achieved by combining agents to induce lytic infection (including chemotherapeutic agents) with anti-herpes virus therapy. Our review indicates good tolerance of VGCV with HAART ± CHOP chemotherapy, and that with newer treatment approaches, pts may live longer than the 6 mo median survival previously reported. To our knowledge, our pts receiving VGCV are the third and fourth pts reported receiving anti-HHV-8 therapy as treatment for PEL. Disclosures: Off Label Use This presentation discusses the use of valganciclovir in the treatment of HHV-8 associated primary effusion lymphoma..

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetViral-associated cancers and disorders→Travaux en français237 207→