A Phase I-II Trial of Bortezomib Plus Oral Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Bortezomib (btz) has established efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). Combinations of btz and other agents can produce even higher response rates. We have reported that oral cyclophosphamide (CY) + prednisone (P) produced partial remissions (PR) in 41% and a median progression free survival (PFS) of 18.6 mos in MM pts who had progressed after ASCT. We now report a phase I trial adding btz to CY + P in 27 patients with relapsed/refractory MM. CY was given p.o. once weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28 day cycle while P 100 mg was given every other morning. CY was given before btz on appropriate days. A total of 8 cycles was planned. The median age was 59 yrs (48–74); 16 were male. Ig subtypes were: IgG (19 pts), IgA (4 pts), kappa light chain (4 pts). The median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–6); all had undergone prior ASCT and 59% had received thalidomide and/or lenalidomide. The median pretreatment β2-microglobulin was 228 nm/L (114–875), albumin 38 g/L (30–46) and creatinine 86 nmol/L (58–153). The dose escalation scheme and toxicity with cycle 1 is shown below: Table 1. Dose levels and toxicity Dose Level N CY dose (mg/m2) Btz dose (mg/m2) Gr 3–4 Toxicity (cycle 1) *Community acquired pneumonia without neutropenia; ** protocol amended to exclude G-CSF for 2 weeks before study entry. 1 6 150 0.7 d 1,8,15 2 CAP* 2 3 300 0.7 d 1,8,15 0 3 3 300 1.0 d 1,8,15 1 ↓ PO4 4 6 300 1.0 d 1,4,8,11 1 ↓ANC**; 1 ↑ AST/ALT 5 6 300 1.3 d 1,4,8,11 1 N/V 6 3 300 1.5 d 1,8,15 0 All the above toxicities above were gr 3 except for 1 transient episode of gr 4 hypophosphatemia. Dose limiting toxicity was not seen. The median number of protocol cycles given per pt was 7 (1–8); 1 pt chose to continue therapy and has received 15 cycles. Toxicities in cycles 2–8 were generally mild. Episodes of infection included shingles (5), gr 3 respiratory infection (6) and febrile neutropenia (2). A total of 168 cycles have been administered; the dose of CY was reduced in 5 cycles due to neutropenia (↓ANC) (3), thrombocytopenia (1) or increased AST/ALT (1), while the btz dose was decreased in 4 cycles due to gr 2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) (1) or ↓ANC (3). 12 pts have completed all 8 cycles, 5 are on therapy and 7 have progressed after a median of cycles 3 (1–7). 3 stopped protocol therapy (physician choice in 1 pt with minimal response, gr 2 PN in 2 pts (after 7 cycles at dose levels 2 and 5) including the pt with prior btz dose reduction. 14/15 pts treated at dose levels 4–6 (effective btz doses) were evaluable for response after receiving at least 2 cycles. Best response was CR/nearCR in 6 (43%) and PR in 7 (50%) for an overall response rate of 93%. The median follow-up is 12 mos (1–20). 6 pts have progressed after stopping therapy. The median PFS is 11 mos, while the median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. The actuarial 1 year OS and PFS are 83% (95% CI 61–93%) and 47% (95% CI 24–68%), respectively. 7 of 10 planned additional pts have entered the phase II portion of the trial at dose level 6. 3 have completed at least 2 cycles; 2 are in CR/near CR while one is in PR. We conclude: Btz 1.5 mg/m2 can be given safely on a convenient weekly schedule days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle in combination with full dose oral CY + P in relapsed/refractory MM pts; preliminary response rates at this dose level include 4/6 (67%) CR/near CRs and 1/6 (17%) PR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».