Co-Administration Therapy Modulates Immunity to FVIII In Hemophilia A Mice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1219 Our long-term objective is the development of novel therapies for the safe and effective treatment of hemophilia. In particular a safe and economic prophylactic modality to prevent inhibitors development is therefore highly desirable. To this end we have explored strategies to modulate inhibitor development based on the co-administration of FVIII with other proteins, specifically albumin and IVIG. We hypothesise that such co-administration may modulate immunity to FVIII and result in a safe and cost-effective therapy. Based on some published evidence that FIX and vWF may have a modulatory effect on FVIII, we reasoned that perhaps albumin might also play an immunomodulatory effect on FVIII. We have developed a protocol for infusing recombinant FVIII in hemophilia A mice modelled on the current therapy of hemophiliacs, and in response to this protocol hemophilia mice develop high titre of inhibitors. Thus, this model can be used to assess potential immununomodulatory strategies. Groups of hemophilia A mice (n=5) were infused weekly IV with 2IU rFVIII for a total of 4 weeks. Three of these groups of mice were also administered human albumin (either 25mg IV, 25mg IP, or 500mg IV) at the same time as FVIII. Mice were bled before the treatment and weekly for the 4 weeks, and total antibodies to FVIII were detected by ELISA. Importantly, while mice receiving FVIII had high antibody titer and were in good health, there was significant mortality in the mice treated with FVIII and albumin. Interestingly, the surviving mice had a very low antibody titre, statistically significant from mice receiving only rFVIII. Given the mortality, another experiment was designed to test the effect of reduced doses of albumin. Groups of hemophilia A mice (n=5) were infused IV with a weekly injection of 2IU rFVIII for a total of 4 weeks supplemented with either 25μg, 50μg or 100μg of human albumin. Mice were bled at weekly intervals until the end of the experiment (day 28), and the titre of anti-FVIIII antibodies was determined. Most All mice survived the entire treatment and were found in good health. Further, the FVIII antibody titre in the group that received albumin was detectable, but significantly reduced with respect to the mice that received only FVIII. Marked variability among individual mice was observed. A group of hemophilia A mice (n=5) received weekly IP injections of 2IU rFVIII. Another group of mice received the same regimen of FVIII in addition to human IVIG (1g/kg). A third group of hemophilia mice received 2IU rFVIII and a higher dose of human IVIG (2g/kg). These doses mimic the established human IVIG regimen. Mice were bled before treatment and at weekly intervals thereafter. The titre of anti-FVIII antibodies in mice was determined by ELISA. By day 21, the antibody titre in mice injected with FVIII was high, as expected. In contrast, the titre in mice receiving FVIII and IVIG was low, and comparable to that of all the mice prior to the treatment (na•ve mice), strongly suggesting an immune modulatory effect by IVIG (Figure 1). Our data supports the limited use of IVIG to treat inhibitors.Figure 1.FVIII / IVIG co-administrationFigure 1. FVIII / IVIG co-administration Our findings suggest that co-administration of FVIII with albumin and IVIG can modulate the humoral immune response to recombinant human FVIII in hemophilia mice. Further, the observed effect appears to be dependent on the dose of albumin co-administered. It is hypothesized that the observed modulation is due to antigen competition, as previously speculated. Importantly, while IVIG was well tolerated by mice, very serious adverse effects were observed in mice treated with high doses of albumin. Interestingly, even the high dose used represents a small fraction of the physiological levels of albumin in human plasma, which is 3–5 g/dL. IVIG, in contrast, is a known modulator of the immune response in humans, and the study of this modulatory effect in a hemophilia mouse may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, relevant for the management of hemophilia. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».