MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2570030833 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.3523.3523

Adult Dual Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Using Myeloablative Total Body Irradiation (1350cGy) and Fludarabine Conditioning

2010· article· en· W2570030833 sur OpenAlexaff
Junya Kanda, David A. Rizzieri, Cristina Gasparetto, Gwynn D. Long, John P. Chute, Keith M. Sullivan, Ashley Morris, Clayton A. Smith, Donna E. Hogge, Janet Nitta, Kevin Song, Donna Niedzwiecki, Nelson J. Chao, Mitchell E. Horwitz

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineFludarabineTotal body irradiationCumulative incidenceUmbilical Cord Blood TransplantationTransplantationCyclophosphamideUmbilical cordTolerabilityInternal medicineSurgeryImmunosuppressionGastroenterologyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationImmunologyAdverse effectChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3523 A high graft failure rate and treatment-related mortality (TRM) have historically been major pitfalls of myeloablative adult umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation. The goal of this prospective clinical trial was to identify an approach that addresses both of these problems. There is compelling evidence that increasing cell dose with the use of two partially matched UCB grafts reduces the graft failure rate. While non-myeloablative preparative regimens reduce TRM, this comes at the cost of an increased risk of disease relapse. Therefore, there is continued clinical need for myeloablative conditioning regimens that exert potent antitumor activity and provide sufficient immunosuppression to facilitate engraftment of mismatched unrelated UCB grafts. The combination of total body irradiation (TBI) (1320cGy)/fludarabine (Flu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy) has been studied extensively by other groups. In this trial, we hypothesized that elimination of Cy would improve tolerability yet maintain comparable anti-tumor effects and engraftment potential. Methods: The conditioning regimen consisted of TBI 1350cGy and Flu 40mg/m2 × 4 days. Two cord blood units at least HLA 4/6 matched with the recipient (low resolution class I and high resolution class II), with a minimum cryopreserved cell dose of 1.5 × 106/kg were selected for transplantation. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and G-CSF was administered until the neutrophil count exceeded 1000/mm3. Disease-free and overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the analysis of cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment, a competing event was defined as relapse or death without an event of interest, whereas in the analysis of relapse and acute and chronic GVHD, a competing event was defined as death without an event of interest. Relapse was defined as a competing risk in the analysis of TRM. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the effect of cell dose on the sustained engraftment of a single cord unit. Results: 27 patients from 2 centers (Duke-24, UBC-3) with a median age of 33 (range, 20–58) years with hematologic malignancies were enrolled on the trial. Fifteen had AML (CR1-1 and CR2-14), five had ALL (CR1-2 and 2CR–3), three had MDS, one had CML, and three had NHL. The median combined total nucleated cell dose was 4.3 (range, 3.2–7.7) × 107/kg. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment (≥500/μl) was 80% (95% confidence interval (CI), 58–91%), with a median of 24 (range, 13–45) days. The cumulative incidences of platelet engraftment ≥20,000 and ≥50,000/μl was 76% (95% CI, 54–88%) and 68% (95% CI, 46–83%), respectively, and a median day of platelet engraftment ≥50,000/μl was 52 (range, 33–78). A single cord blood unit represented ≥79% of hematopoiesis by day 100. Higher cryopreserved and infused total nucleated cell dose and infused CD3+ cell dose were significant factors associated with the predominant UCB unit (P = 0.032, 0.020, and 0.042, respectively). Three patients experienced graft failure, and hematopoiesis was restored in two patients with either autologous or haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells. The cumulative incidences of grades II–IV and grades III–IV acute GVHD were 37% (95%CI, 20–55%) and 11% (95% CI, 3–26%), respectively and that of chronic GVHD was 31% (95% CI, 15–49%). With a median follow-up period of 23 months, the overall and disease-free survival rates at 2 years were 58% (95% CI, 34–75%) and 52% (95% CI, 29–70%), respectively. The 180 day and 2-year incidence of TRM was 19% (95% CI, 7–35%) and 28% (95% CI, 12–47%), respectively. The relapse rate at 2 years was 20% (95% CI, 7–37%). As an indicator of tolerability of this modified myeloablative regimen, we observed a cumulative incidence of total parental nutrition usage of just 56%. In conclusion, we find that the modified myeloablative regimen of TBI (1350cGy)/fludarabine provides dual cord blood engraftment rates comparable to more conventional myeloablative regimens. In contrast to other reports, we found that graft size predicts for the predominant UCB unit. This study supports the use of TBI 1350cGy/fludarabine as an alternative to conventional myeloablative conditioning for dual UCB transplantation and provides justification for larger studies. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Fludarabine; used as part of the stem cell transplant conditioning regimen. Chao:Genzyme: Research Funding. Horwitz:Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→Travaux en français237 207→