MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2572734824 · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1554224

Mechanical Injury to Human Intervertebral Discs and Isolated Cells Initiates Events Implicated in Degeneration and Pain

2015· article· en· W2572734824 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Lisbet Haglund, Derek H. Rosenzweig, Emerson Krock, Rahul Gawri, Thomas Steffen, Jean Ouellet, Michael H. Weber

Notice bibliographique

RevueGlobal Spine Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineIntervertebral discAnnulus (botany)Cell biologyStrain (injury)NucleusAnatomyPathologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Painful degenerating intact human intervertebral discs (IVDs) produce elevated levels of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), cytokines, and neuropeptides but events regulating their expression are poorly understood. Mechanical overload has been proposed as one potential initiating mechanism. The aim of this study was to investigate the cellular responses in IVDs and isolated disc cells exposed to mechanical overload or strain. Methods Lumbar spine segments were harvested from consenting donors via the Transplant Quebec organ donation program in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. A total of nine discs from six donors were used in this study. Intact IVDs were prepared and cells isolated using a standard technique. Intact discs with cartilaginous endplates were loaded with a single ramp compression peaking at either approximately 0.2 MPa (noninjurious) or about 1.5 MPa (injurious) stress applied at a rate of 30% strain per second. Injurious compression protocol consistently yields endplate fracture. Discs were immediately put in low serum containing media after loading. For isolated cell experiments, 2 × 10 5 nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) cells were seeded on flexible or static silicone dishes. The flexible dishes were exposed to a 20% magnitude cyclic mechanical strain at 0.0001 Hz was applied to the cultures for 8 h/d over 2 days. Conditioned media was collected and RNA was isolated. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to assess TLR, NGF, and TNF gene expression. Conditioned media from intact discs and isolated cells was applied to PC12 cells and neurite outgrowth was assessed. Commercially available cytokine arrays were used to investigate protein levels of cytokines released from intact discs and isolated cells. Results Elevated levels of proteoglycan, inflammatory cytokines, and pain mediators were released from intact discs exposed to injurious loading. The highest levels were found 3 days postinjury and the conditioned media caused significantly induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells compared with that of the control group. About 50% of the cells in the IVDs died as a result of the inflicted trauma. Isolated NP and AF cells were exposed to a high-magnitude strain at low frequency to preserve cell attachments and maintain cell viability. The protocol was applied to evaluate if the adverse mechanical stimulation of the cells or the induced cell death caused by the injurious loading of the intact IVDs was responsible for the increased expression of inflammatory cytokines and pain mediators. Our data showed that high-magnitude low-frequency strain is sufficient to induce expression inflammatory cytokines and pain mediators in the absence of cell death. We also found a small but significant upregulation of TLR 2 and 4 in both NP and AF cells. Conclusion Cell death and cytokine production combined with loss of glycosaminoglycan indicate that mechanical injury to intact IVDs and isolated cells initiates cellular processes leading to disc degeneration. Once the proteoglycan content in the matrix has been degraded, elevated levels of NGF could lead to neuronal ingrowth directly causing pain. Increased TLR expression induced by high strain may prime cells toward a degenerate phenotype and could be a novel therapeutic target for degenerative disc disease.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,846
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,546

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGlobal Spine JournalMême sujetSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyTravaux en français237 207