Academic Community Standards for Chronic Transfusion Therapy In Children with Sickle Cell Anemia and Abnormal Transcranial Doppler Velocities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2643 Children with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and abnormal transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities receive chronic transfusion therapy in an effort to prevent a primary stroke. Typically the goal is maintaining sickle hemoglobin (HbS) <30%, however this goal may be difficult to achieve in actual clinical practice. The NHLBI-sponsored TCD With Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH) trial will compare standard therapy (transfusions) with alternative therapy (hydroxyurea) for the prevention of primary stroke. The transfusions will be given according to current transfusion practices at the participating academic sites. To determine the current academic community standards for primary stroke prophylaxis in children with SCA, 32 potential clinical sites collected data for children with abnormal TCD velocities who are receiving chronic transfusion therapy to prevent a primary stroke. The eligibility criteria included all children with SCA, age 4.0–15.9 years who were on chronic transfusion therapy to prevent a primary stroke due to previous abnormal TCD examination. After IRB-approval, subject and transfusion-related data were collected for all TWiTCH-eligible patients over the 12-month period from 9/1/2008 to 8/31/2009. Variables included year of birth, gender, year chronic transfusions began, TCD velocities that led to transfusion therapy, weight, %HbS transfusion goal, type and volume, pre-transfusion hemoglobin concentration and %HbS, and interval between transfusions. Data were analyzed both “per transfusion” and “per patient.” A total of 3970 transfusions were administered to 340 pediatric patients (mean approximate age at time of survey 10.2 ± 4.1 years, M: F = 0.9:1) over the 12-month period, with a mean of 11.6 ± 2.8 transfusions per patient. The average of the highest TCD velocity that led to transfusion therapy was 221 ± 27 cm/sec. Maximum velocities for right and left hemispheres were 201.2 ± 35.3 and 207.7 ± 31.8 cm/sec, respectively, supporting equal susceptibility. The mean approximate age at the start of transfusion therapy was 6.2 ± 2.6 years with average transfusion duration of 4.0 years. Most children (79%) received primarily simple transfusions, while 19% had primarily exchange transfusions (11% manual and 8% automated), and 2% multiple transfusion types. The transfusion goal was HbS <30% at almost all sites (84%). An equal number of patients developed erythrocyte alloantibodies (13.6%) and autoantibodies (13.7%). Transfusions were considered late if administered later than 7 days beyond the scheduled date. On average, late transfusions were given 1.3 ± 5.5 days after the 7 day allowable window. The average pre-transfusion hemoglobin concentration was 9.0 ± 0.9 gm/dL. The average pre-transfusion %HbS was 34.1 ± 11.2%, with a median value of 32.9%. The 75th percentile for HbS values was 40.9%, while the 90th percentile was 49.5%. There were profound differences among institutional pre-transfusion %HbS values, ranging from 23 ± 14% HbS at one institution where 103 transfusions were given to 9 patients during the 12-month period to 48 ± 15% at another institution where 95 transfusions were administered to 9 patients during the same time frame. These data indicate that current transfusion practice to prevent primary stroke varies among academic pediatric institutions, and 30%HbS is not an easily attainable goal for the TWiTCH study that includes chronic transfusion therapy within the Standard Arm. As a result of this analysis, the TWiTCH study will recommend chronic transfusions with the goal of maintaining HbS <30%, but only record a protocol violation when the HbS value exceeds 45%. Disclosures: Off Label Use: It will include the use of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell anemia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,041 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».