When Would a Spine Surgeon Have Surgery for a Herniated Disc?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Surgical indications are not always clear cut and patients need to participate in the process of making an informed decision, weighing the potential risks, and benefits to have surgery or not. This decision is likely heavily influenced based on their pain level, work, and activity limitations. There is much information available on the outcomes and complications of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The purpose of this study was to determine for which indications spine surgeons would have surgery themselves. Materials and Methods A survey was designed using Survey Monkey, which ensures responses are anonymous. The survey was sent to the ISASS surgeon membership. The survey collected basic demographics. The scenario for seeking treatment was that if you had sciatica with a 5 mm disc herniation identified on MRI and pain at the confirmed level, when would you consider some form of direct decompressive surgery? The second set of questions addressed if in the same circumstances and having failed nonoperative care, separately assessed pain level, work limitation level, and nonwork activity limitation level for which the surgeon would have spine surgery to treat the herniated disc. Results There were 67 responses to the survey. The majority of those completing the survey were in the age ranges of 45 to 54 years (40.3%) and 55 to 64 years (35.8%). The most frequent response selected to the question about the number of years in practice was 21 to 30 years (43.3%). More than half selected one of the two categories indicating performing between 100 and 300 spine surgeries a year. The majority of responses came from members in the United States, but there were participants from Canada, Australia, Europe, and Asia. Responses to the question about having surgery for a 5 mm herniation indicated that 75.8% of surgeons would have surgery if they had buttock and leg pain below the knee that limited work activities 2 of 5 days so that on those 2 days you had to stop after half day of work. Less than 20% would have surgery if symptoms interfered with nonwork activities, but not work. Of note, 18.2% indicated that they would not have surgery for the herniated disc regardless of the symptoms experienced. The second series of questions separately assessed pain, work, and nonwork activities. With respect to pain intensity, on a 0 to 10 scale, 63.6% would have surgery for scores of 7 to 10. With respect to work, 39.4% indicated they would have surgery if experiencing continual pain at work, 34.8% would have surgery if able to work only half days, and 19.7% would have surgery only if they were unable to work at all. Partial limitation of activities would lead 28.4% of respondents to have surgery, while 68.7% would have surgery if their activities were severely limited. Discussion The results of this survey found that many spine surgeons would have surgery if the pain was 7 or greater on a scale of 10, they continually experienced pain during work or had severely limited activities. Interestingly, 18.2% indicated they would not have surgery regardless of symptoms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».