The Efficacy and Accuracy of Cone Beam CT (O-Arm) Navigation (StealthStation) on Screw Position in Adult Scoliosis Surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Intraoperative CT and navigation systems may provide an opportunity to improve precision and accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and in so doing, improve patient outcomes. Adult spinal deformity provides unique anatomical challenges potentially amenable to spinal navigation. Our study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of intraoperative cone beam CT navigation for pedicle screw placement in complex spinal deformity cases. Material and Methods We identified all patients treated at our institution with spinal fusion for the primary diagnosis of major adult deformity between January 2008 and December 2012 in whom O-arm and StealthStation navigation was used (NAV). A historic control cohort (non-NAV) was matched based on age, number of levels, curve type and size, and previous fusion. The number and timing (intraoperative, early symptomatic postoperative, late symptomatic postoperative, and incidental) of screw malposition and the need for revision screw placement were recorded. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Any screw with pedicle breach greater than 0 mm was recorded as misplaced. The direction and anatomical level of misplaced screws were also determined. Quantitative statistical analysis compared screw placement between NAV and non-NAV cases. Results A total of 56 patients met the inclusion criteria in both cohorts (112 patients). The mean number of screws placed in each group was not significantly different (17.29 in NAV and 17.71 in non-NAV, p = 0.75). Thirty-eight (34%) patients in the non-NAV group had misplaced screws compared with 21 (19%) in the NAV group ( p = 0.002). The detection of incidental screw malposition was significantly higher in the non-NAV cases (44.6 vs. 23.2%, p < 0.05) and the need for intraoperative screw revision favored navigation ( p < 0.03). Six cervical screws, 16 cervicothoracic, 90 thoracic, and 112 lumbar screws were placed. Early postoperative screw revision rates approached significance ( p < 0.06) favoring navigation. The number of adverse events and length of stay (mean 17 vs. 20.4 days in NAV and non-NAV groups, respectively) were not significantly different. The mean number of postoperative CT scans was significantly fewer in the NAV group (9 vs. 22 in non-NAV group, p = 0.004), while mean OR time was statistically different between groups (492 minutes in the NAV group vs. 408 minutes in the non-NAV, p = 0.002). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that intraoperative CT-guided navigation provides an equally safe and more accurate and precise tool for pedicle screw placement than traditional techniques in adult spinal deformity surgery. There were more intraoperative screws adjusted and fewer postoperative screws revised with NAV. Far fewer patients required postoperative CT examination with the use of NAV.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».