MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2577872721 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.3897.3897

Comprehensive Assessment of Clinical Outcomes for CLL Patients with Trisomy 12 (+12): Results of a Population-Based Analysis of 822 CLL Patients in British Columbia (BC), Canada

2012· article· en· W2577872721 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Alina S. Gerrie, Steven J.T. Huang, Hélène Bruyèrè, Chinmay B. Dalal, Monica Hrynchak, Aly Karsan, Khaled M. A. Ramadan, Adam C. Smith, Tanya L. Gillan, Cynthia L. Toze

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's HospitalRoyal Columbian HospitalVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePopulationInternal medicineCohortOncologyHazard ratioExact testProportional hazards modelClinical trialConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3897 Background: Important advances in the understanding of CLL pathogenesis include the discovery that NOTCH1 mutations are present in ∼28% of pts harboring +12. There is a need for improved understanding of the clinical outcomes of CLL patients (pts) with +12 on a population-level, as this subgroup is rapidly becoming the focus of biologic studies evaluating pathogenesis of disease and clinical trials investigating novel targeted therapies. In the province of BC, population 4.5 million, CLL pts receive uniform evaluation and therapy based on centrally derived protocols with FISH testing implemented since 2004. We sought to characterize the clinical outcomes of +12 in this large unselected population-based cohort of CLL pts. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data on all pts referred for CLL FISH testing at 1 of 3 BC cytogenetic labs from 2004–2011 were entered into the BC Provincial CLL Database and included in this analysis. Pts without a confirmed diagnostic date were excluded. Baseline features of pts with and without +12 were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous (cnts) variables. Primary and secondary endpoints were OS and TFS (defined as time from diagnosis [dx] to first therapy). Percent of abnormal (%abn) nuclei harboring +12 was evaluated for association with OS/TFS. Cox proportional hazard (PH) models were constructed to determine predictors of OS/TFS for the +12 cohort, including age at dx, sex, Rai stage (0, 1–2, 3–4), WBC at dx, CD38 positivity and concomitant 17p-, 11q- or deletion 13q (13q-). Cox PH models were also constructed to determine effect of +12 on TFS/OS for the entire cohort. Results: As of Dec. 2011, 882 pts had CLL FISH testing in BC of which 164 (19%) had +12 on their 1st FISH test: 8 (5%) with concomitant 17p-; 14 (9%) with 11q-; 142 (86%) without either 17p- or 11q-, of which 43 (30%) had 13q-; 16/124 tested (13%) had an IGH translocation [t(IGH)]. Of the 164 +12 pts, median age at dx was 60 yrs (range 35–93), 70% were male, 10% had Rai stage 3–4. At median follow-up of 4.5 yrs (range 0–19), 95 pts (59%) received treatment, 31 (19%) died. For the +12 cohort, median OS was 14.7 yrs (95% CI 9.8–19.0) and median TFS 3.7 yrs (95% CI 2.7–5.4). Of the 658 non +12 CLL pts (N12CPs), prevalence of recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities (RCA) were: 17p-, 10%; 11q-, 11%; 13q-, 60%; t(IGH) 7%. Significant differences between +12 and N12CPs included more CD38+ pts (66% vs 28%, P<0.001), higher t(IGH) incidence (13% vs 7%, P=0.04) and fewer 17p- (5% vs 10%, P=0.03) or 13q- (26% vs 60%, P<0.001) abn among +12 pts. When pts were grouped by hierarchical FISH abn, +12 pts retained an intermediate OS (median 15.9 yrs) and TFS (median 4.2 yrs) when compared to other RCAs (Fig 1A). Multivariate analysis (MVA) for the whole cohort (n=822) demonstrated no significant effect of +12 on OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36–1.43, P=.35) or TFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69–1.36, P=.86) after adjustment for covariates. For the +12 cohort (n=162), univariate analysis demonstrated shorter OS associated with age (P=.001), Rai stage (P=.01) and 17p- (P=.07). A longer OS was associated with presence of 13q- (median OS 11.6 vs 18.7 yrs, P=.04), Fig 1B. Shorter TFS was associated with Rai stage (P<.001), WBC at dx (P=.01) and 17p- (P=.04). %abn nuclei harboring +12 was not predictive of OS (P=.33) or TFS (P=.25) as a cnts variable; however those with <20% vs ≥20% abn had a significant improvement in OS (P=.02). MVA for the +12 cohort demonstrated Rai stage (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.23– 8.63, P=.02) and 11q- (HR 9.07, 95% CI 1.44–57.02, P=.02) as independent risk factors for OS, while 13q- did not retain its protective effect (P=.98). For TFS, MVA found Rai stage (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.78–4.78, P<.001) and 17p- (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.52–19.43, P=.01) as negative predictors while 13q- (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.08–3.75, P=.03) again had a positive effect. Conclusion: We report the largest, population-based cohort of CLL pts with FISH testing and confirm that +12 occurs in 19% of CLL pts and in the absence of 17p- or 11q-, confers an intermediate prognosis. The presence of 13q- had a protective effect on TFS and a trend towards improved OS, thus improving the prognosis of a subset of +12 pts. This finding is consistent with recent observations that NOTCH1 mutations and 13q- are mutually exclusive in +12 pts and may explain the clinical heterogeneity seen in this subgroup. Further research into these distinct subsets of +12 pts is warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,119

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207