Outcome of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Thalassemia Major in India
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the only curative therapy currently available for patients with thalassemia major (TM). In developing countries, the significant delay that often occurs between diagnosis and SCT for a variety of reasons and the inadequate transfusion-chelation that most patients can access, leads to greater liver damage and advanced risk status for SCT in most of these patients. This study was therefore aimed at evaluating the outcome of SCT among a large cohort of these patients in India. Methodology: Data on the clinical profile and outcome after allogeneic SCT carried out for patients with TM was collected from the participating centers. All patients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2014 with matched related (MRD) or unrelated donors (MUD) were included in the analysis. Conditioning regimen was based on Bu/Cy (busulfan and cyclophosphamide, ± ATG) or Treo/Thio/Flu (treosulfan, thiotepa and fludarabine) in the vast majority of patients. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted predominantly of cyclosporine and short course methotrexate. Data was collected from prospectively maintained standardized institutional individual medical records and analyzed with the SPSS software version 16.0 Results: Five hundred and ninety six patients [356 males and 240 females] with a median age of 7 years (range: 1 - 25) underwent allogeneic SCT during the study period. There were 560 (94.0%) children aged ≤ 15 years, while 36 (6.0%) were aged >15 years at the time of SCT. Majority of the patients belonged to Pesaro class 3 (n=310; 52.0%), while 219 to class 2 (36.7%) and 67 to class 1 (11.2%). Among the 226/310 patients in Class 3, 126 (55.8%) belonged to the Vellore high risk category (age >7 years and liver size >5cms). Conditioning regimen was based on Bu/Cy (±ATG) in 315 patients (52.9%) while in 278 (46.6%) patients it was based on Treo/Thio/Flu. There was a MRD for 564 patients (94.6%) while 32 (5.4%) received the graft from MUDs. Of the total of 596 patients, 568 (95.3%) engrafted by day +28. 22 patients (3.6%) had early mortality by day +15, 23 (3.9%) more by day +28, and another 50 (8.4%) by day +100. Graft rejection was noted in a total of 38 patients (6.4%), 6 of whom were before day +28. The overall incidence of acute GVHD was 195/568 (34.3%) with grade II-IV in 25.2% (n=143) and grade III-IV was seen in 9.2% (n=52). Chronic GVHD, which was limited in most patients, was seen in 91/501 patients (18.2%) of evaluable patients. At a mean follow up of 11 years (range: 0 -14 years), the overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) for the entire group are 78.9%±1.9% and 72.8%±2.1%. A total of 119 (19.9%) of patients expired - 58 (48.7%) of whom were due to infections while regimen related toxicity lead to death in 23 (19.3%), GVHD in 10 (8.4%) and 28 (23.5%) died due to other causes. The OS and EFS for the different risk categories were the following: class 1 (95.5%±2.5%, 92.5%±3.2%), class 2 (82.0%±2.6%, 75.9%±2.9%) and class 3 (72.5%±3.6%, 65.6%±3.6%), (p=0.001 and p=0.000, respectively). The OS and EFS among those with grade II to IV GVHD was 76.1%±3.6 and 75.4±3.6% while among those with grade III/IV GVHD was 40.4%±6.8, respectively. We compared the outcome in patients who received Bu/Cy based conditioning (n=315; 52.9%) with those receiving Treo/Thio/Flu based conditioning (n=278; 46.6%). In terms of their baseline characteristics, there were greater number of older and class 3 patients in the latter group. (Table 1) While the OS was comparable in the two groups, the EFS was higher among those receiving Treo/Thio/Flu with Class 3 disease (72.3±3.2% vs 58.8±4.9%; p=0.045). (Fig.1) This result was more pronounced among those with Vellore high risk class 3 disease (70.6%±5.0% vs 46.3±7.6%; p=0.010). (Fig.2) Conclusion: The majority of patients with thalassemia major undergoing SCT in India are in the higher risk categories. The overall outcome of SCT among these patients is comparable with those reported in the literature. Treosulfan based conditioning regimen has improved outcome significantly among the high risk patients. Table 1. Bu/Cy(n=315)N (%) Treo/Thio/Flu(n=278)N (%) P value Age <=15>15 309 (98.1)6 (1.9) 248 (89.2)30 (10.8) 0.000 Risk groupClass 1Class 2Class 3 35 (11.1)164 (52.1)116 (36.8) 32 (11.5)54 (19.4)192 (69.1) 0.000 Class 3 HRClass 3 LR 43 (57.3)32 (42.7) 82 (54.7)68 (45.3) 0.776 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».