Report on Bridges 2016—In Memory of Our Founder, Reza Sarhangi (1952–2016)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Report on Bridges 2016 -- In Memory of Our Founder, Reza Sarhangi (1952-2016) Carlo H. Sequin, EECS Computer Science, U. C. Berkeley For the last decade, Bridges has been the premiere international conference devoted to mathematical connections in art, architecture, music, and many other cultural domains. It regularly attracts a few hundred participants -- artists, mathematicians, computer scientists, teachers, etc. -- from dozens of countries. The first conference was organized by Reza Sarhangi [1] in Winfield, Kansas, in 1998. Since then it has moved through nine different countries and diverse places such as London (UK), Seoul (South Korea), Pecs (Hungary), Granada (Spain), Coimbra (Portugal), Leeuwarden (the Netherlands), and Banff (Canada). You can learn more about the origins and history of this conference series in an article by Kristof Fenyvesi, one of the organizers of this year’s conference [2]. This year, the annual Bridges conference was held in a particularly beautiful and serene location: The University of Jyvaskyla in Finland. The facilities in the Agora Center were superb: comfortable, modern auditoriums and pleasant, more intimate meeting rooms. Everything was well-signed and easy to find, and there was also a great cafeteria in the same building! The conference comprised four days of talks and interactions plus an optional excursion day. The formal, refereed part of the conference entailed 10 plenary presentations, 40 regular papers, 61 short papers, and 17 “hands-on” workshops. At any time, there were many interesting options in four parallel tracks, and it was often difficult to choose which session to attend. Fortunately, the complete printed proceedings were available at registration time; this allowed one to make informed – but still very hard – choices. Bridges is much more than just the presentation of submitted papers. There is also a curated art exhibition, a festival of short mathematical movies, a session of mathematical poetry, and an informal theatre event performed by conference participants. Moreover, participants who did not want to formally present a refereed paper can still give 10-minute oral summaries in a couple of “abstracts only” sessions and could also display tangible works that they brought to the conference in a large “Show and Tell” area in the lobby and its adjacent corridors. University Hotel Alba, Jyvaskyla The lobby of the conference building Sadly, this was the first conference where Reza Sarhangi, the founder of this conference series and the President of the Bridges organization, could no longer be with us and infect us with his boundless enthusiasm. The conference started with a touching memorial session, where Bridges board members and friends shared fond memories of interactions with Reza [1]. We all miss him very much as a person; but it was also clear, that he was present in spirit and that he lives on through his various legacies: the annual Bridges Conferences, the Mini-Bridges Symposia, and a whole shelf full of beautiful and inspiring Bridges Proceedings!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,231 | 0,196 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».