GATA1s Induces Hyperproliferation of Eosinophil Precursors.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2318 Transient leukemia (TL) is evident in 5–10% of all neonates with Down syndrome (DS) and closely linked to characteristic N-terminal truncating GATA1-mutations (GATA1s). Here we investigated the relationship between GATA1s-mutation and clonal eosinophilia observed in a cohort of TL patients (23%, n=60 DS neonates diagnosed with TL). TL-blasts exhibited an activated eosinophilic genetic program (as demonstrated by GSEA and validated by qRT-PCR) and had an increased propensity to differentiate along the eosinophilic lineage in vitro. Sorted patient TL-eosinophils carried the same mutation in GATA1 as the TL-blasts showing their clonal origin. To delineate the role of GATA1s in the TL-associated eosinophilia, we examined the myeloid differentiation of human fetal hematopoietic progenitors ectopically expressing GATA1 or GATA1s. We used a modified lentiviral LeGO-iG vector simultaneously expressing murine Gata1s or full-length Gata1 and an shRNA against endogenous GATA1 (65% knockdown efficiency, p<0.05), ensuring the investigation of the net effect of GATA1s in cells with low endogenous GATA1 expression. Ectopic expression of Gata1s in human CD34+ fetal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) induced 10-fold higher (p<0.01) proliferation rate of granulated progenitor cells in the myeloid in vitro differentiation medium accompanied by a monocytic differentiation block and reduction of neutrophils. In methylcellulose colony-forming assays, we observed formation of atypical colonies (29% of all CFUs), consisting of hyperproliferative myeloid progenitors with eosinophilic and basophilic granulation. These cells predominated in replating experiments, leading to a 15-fold higher cumulative number of CFUs after the fourth round of replating for Gata1s-transduced cells compared to the empty vector-transduced cells (p<0.001). To elucidate the lineage nature of these myeloid progenitors, we used high throughput chip cytometry that allowed us to study expression of 20 surface and intracellular markers of the cells from a picked Gata1s-colony. We observed high expression of the early myeloid marker CD13 and of IL-3 receptor (CD123). In conjunction with histochemical stainings chip cytometry allowed us to exclude monocytic, erythroid, lymphoid and basophilic/mast cell origin of these cells as all markers for these lineages were low or absent. Global gene expression profiling using microarray technology of Gata1s-, Gata1- and empty vector-transduced HSPCs, grown for four days in the myeloid differentiation medium and of empty vector transduced cells, before we transferred them into the myeloid differentiation medium demonstrated enrichment (GSEA) of eosinophilic genes in Gata1- and Gata1s-transduced cells and downregulation of monocytic, neutrophil, basophil, mast cell and HSPC gene sets. Thus, global gene expression analyses, chip cytometry and histochemical methods identified Gata1s-transduced myeloid progenitors as atypical eosinophilic promyelocytes with abnormal pro-eosinophilic granulation. However, though GATA1s retained the function of GATA1 to promote differentiation of HSPCs along the eosinophil lineage while repressing the neutrophil/monocytic program, only Gata1s-transduced cells demonstrated a hyperproliferative phenotype. GSEA of known E2F-bound target genes and qRT-PCR validation demonstrated that, unlike Gata1, Gata1s was not able to repress a number of GATA1 target genes, such as MYC, and the pro-proliferative E2F transcription network perturbing the balance between differentiation and proliferation. This might result in the hyperproliferation of eosinophil precursors at the expense of the neutrophil/monocytic lineage. As E2F target genes were also upregulated in sorted TL-eosinophils (n=3), we propose the same molecular mechanism of GATA1s-induced clonal eosinophilia in TL. Disclosures: Hennig: European Patent Office: Patents & Royalties.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».