MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2580534249 · doi:10.1111/nin.12181

Gender queer: politics is killing us

2017· article· en· W2580534249 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura C. Hein, Mary Foster Cox

Notice bibliographique

RevueNursing Inquiry · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransgenderQueerGender studiesLesbianTransphobiaSexual identityHomosexualityIdentity (music)SociologyPoliticsSexual orientationPsychologyHuman sexualityPolitical scienceArtLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Nearly everyone is familiar with the term gay or homosexual, and some have even heard the acronym LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning). It is the T and the Q that need a little more discussion. Transgender is an overarching term for anyone who has a gender identity that differs from their genitals. A more contemporary acronym is transgender or gender non-conforming (TGNC). A non-binary or gender queer person is considered part of TGNC due to the non-conformity to stereotypical female or male gender roles and expressions. TGNC, specifically the non-conforming section, includes a vast array of gender expressions. Some examples of various GNC types are as follows: agender, gender fluid, bigender, two-spirit, and gender queer/queer (Austin, & Goodman, 2016; Frohard-Dourlent, Dobson, Clark, Doull, & Saewyc, 2016). Of those who self-identified as transgender or gender non-conforming in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, 36% reported a non-binary gender identity (Klein, & Golub, 2016). A large Canadian study of transgender youth-young adults (Veale, Saewyc, Frohard-Dourlent, Dobson, & Clark, 2015) found that 70% reported more than one gender identity, and Kuper, Nussbaum & Mustanski (2012) found gender queer to be the most prevalent identity in a study of transgender adults. The reason any of this matters is related to the cultural and social emphasis that we in America, and in many Western countries, place on sex and assumptions of gender. If our worldview inserts people into the dichotomous boxes of male or female, it not only marginalizes (and endangers) those who do not cleanly fit into that binary, but it also effectively erases them. People will either hide who they are by choosing M or F on some form, or they will choose to live freely and face the social, political, and physical consequences of their authenticity. This forced binary occurs nearly everywhere: when you fill out your health history at the office of your healthcare provider, when you are called back to an examination room as Mr. or Ms. so-and-so, when you document a sex on your passport or driver's license, and in places where the information is frankly irrelevant, such as entering an online sweepstakes. Accessing a facility or activity that does not coincide with ones’ perceived sex can be met with social opprobrium and/or violence—something gender non-conforming or gender non-binary people face daily. This is not speculation—80 incidents of LGBT-targeted hate-based harassment and/or violence were reported in the 7 days subsequent to the recent contentious American presidential election (Southern Poverty Law Center, November 18, 2016). The increasing number (perhaps only because we are now measuring it) of genderqueer people begs the question—Are we becoming postgender in America? Postgenderists posit that gender assignments limit human potential due to their arbitrary and unnecessary nature (Dvorsky, & Hughes, 2008). A risk in emphasizing the fluidity of gender expression is exclusion of the transgender community—persons who feel a deep need to live life in a body different from their birth sex. However, the move toward postgenderism may be hindered, if not terminated in America, due to the recent presidential election. A Trump/Pence presidency in America may have substantial implications for the civil rights and freedom of gender queer people to live authentically. The cultural return of America to the 1940s either erases or oppresses non-binary people. It is important to note that dissolution of LGBTQ rights is a hallmark of Pence's career. There is no place for transgender or gender queer people in this worldview. This erasure is not lost on gender queer people. LGBTQ suicide hotlines were overwhelmed with calls when the winner of the presidential election became clear (Mettler, November 10, 2016). This presidential election only serves to remind us of how tenuous LGBTQ civil rights and safety really are. The election communicated that half of America including our family and friends was willing to trade LGBTQ civil rights and safety, for something else they perceived Trump and Pence to be offering (e.g., a tax break, school vouchers, a large border wall). There is a new reality in America, in many contexts, because of this presidential election. Boundaries on speech and behavior have been decimated and need to be redemarcated and re-established. As a culture, we need to move beyond the ‘bathroom police’ of antitransgender legislation that harms everyone—gender non-conforming people and America. As healthcare providers, we have an ethical obligation to advocate for and to care for all individuals, families, and communities. As nurses, we have a moral obligation to make every effort to rebuild and support a more accepting, humane, and tolerant society.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,612
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,166
Tête enseignante GPT0,461
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNursing InquiryMême sujetLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyTravaux en français237 207