A person centred model for people with complex care needs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is well known in the literature how the modern health and care systems are being oriented to launch and develop national strategies to construct and build a more comprehensive system for the people with "complex health and social care needs". Most of Chronic Care programs have been introduced proactive care management for this vulnerable population who are causing high utilization of high cost services. However a new Integrated health and social care approach have been introduced in some countries and regions and there is a need of identifying these populations at risk with new and well accepted criteria and new care approaches in the field.This workshop will combine both the "policy and implementation in practice" related to proactive management of people with complex care needs from a joint health and social care perspective.2 or 3 countries will be invited to explain main strategies and real implementation examples which could be easily escalated. An additional overview of Walter Wodchis as international expert and reviewer of different international national or regional best practices will be incorporated.We will introduce different issues related to complexity:- Earlier work of complex chronic health needs during implementation of Chronic Care programs. Some part of this work has started some time ago and experience of some yers could be- Evolution from the “complex health needs” toward a “complex health and social care needs” approach. New approaches to identify criteria related to complex social care needs will be explored especially related to the social care area.·International overview of the most recognized innovative experience related to care for people with complex health and social care needs- "Terminology" required to talk properly about "complexity": complexity, complex care needs, multimorbidity, complex health and social care needs,...?- Complex care in practice approach explaining which strategy is being developed to take care of people with complex health and social care needs from an “individual, team and territorial (county)” perspective- ICT developments to support work with different organizations and professionals who work collaboratively to manage people under a "person centred model": introduction of Key Information Summary or Individual Intervention Plans to be shared by all organizations and professionals under a 24/7 scheme and other strategies- Evaluation approach of complex care strategyIt would be introduced 2 or maybe 3 experiences and an additional international overview:- Catalonia and Scotland will talk about both policy and implementation in practice models which have priorised "complex care approach"- Walter Wodchis from Intitit oof Healt Policy, Management and Evaluation at University of Toronto speak about the most promising and innovative world experiences related to complex care (Walter Wodchis is co-author of the June issue of IJIC publishing 7 study cases related to complexity), showing lessons about these experiences and reccommendations for countries and regions developing and implementing Integrated Care for people with complex health and social care needs.This workshop will offer a combination of policy and implementation in practice issues and additionally an overview of the best practices in the world related to complex care
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,013 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,035 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».