MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2580709650 · doi:10.1177/073953290302400212

<i>NRJ</i> Book: Newsworkers Unite: Labor, Convergence, and North American Newspapers

2003· article· en· W2580709650 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marc Edge

Notice bibliographique

RevueNewspaper Research Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLabor Movements and Unions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewspaperNoticeConsolidation (business)Political scienceConvergence (economics)LawEconomicsEconomic growth

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Newsworkers Unite: Labor, Convergence, and North American Newspapers, by Catherine McKercher (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002, $75 hard cover, $27.95 paperback) 232 pages.Reviewed by Marc EdgeThe recent trends toward increasing concentration of press ownership and technological convergence of media have served to put organized labor at a disadvantage. Concentration has resulted in larger, more diversified media corporations, which are often powerful international conglomerates. These employers have proven ever more formidable adversaries across bargaining table due to their increased and more centralized resources. Convergence has served to eliminate whole categories of labor and to create additional opportunities for corporate cost-cutting across media.These phenomena have been well documented from an industry standpoint, but less attention has been paid by scholars to their effect on media workers. The unions, however, notably The Newspaper Guild (TNG) and International Typographical Union (ITU), took notice early on of these threats to their very existence. As a result, furious efforts ensued to form strategic alliances aimed at self-preservation. But unlike cold economic logic that usually governs corporate mergers and takeovers, labor unions are subject to often fractious politics, which can make such matters unpredictable at best.The result has made for a fascinating study by Canadian media scholar Catherine McKercher, title of which is not exhortation it seems at first glance but rather a well-documented account of recent union consolidation. An important chapter of labor history, it is packed with such primary sources as interviews with many of union officials involved. It lacks only a glossary to aid uninitiated in keeping track of seemingly endless acronyms. An associate professor in School of Journalism at Carleton University in Ottawa, McKercher's position north of border allows for an interesting perspective to her study. The Canadian locals of media unions, in addition to seeking security, also often sought a measure of autonomy from American influence which historically dominated them. Answering the Canadian question in second half of her book thus results in a study as much of nationalism as of media and labor convergence. From there, McKercher narrows her focus even further, to examine forced convergence of labor at Pacific Press in Vancouver on Canada's west coast. The case study makes for a fitting climax to McKercher's research, which is an updated version of her humanities dissertation, completed in 2000 at Concordia University in Montreal.A former newspaper journalist, McKercher provides a useful history of newspaper unions by tracing 18th Century origins of craft guilds that comprised first unions of printers in London and New York in days when typesetter and editor were often one. The National Typographical Union formed in 1850 became ITU soon thereafter when Canadian printers were admitted, but process quickly became one of divergence instead, with pressmen, photoengravers and journalists breaking away from ITU to form separate unions. By 1960, however, looming technological changes that threatened to make work of compositors redundant through use of computer technology led many in ITU to conclude that it had been a mistake to allow their co-workers to break away. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,317
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,975

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3170,170

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,370
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNewspaper Research JournalMême sujetLabor Movements and UnionsTravaux en français237 207