Kitchen Kinetics: Women's Movements in Sigrun Bülow-Hübe's Research
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A principios del siglo XXI Mexico es un escenario abigarrado, donde aumenta diario el reclamo de las muieres por ocupar espacios de participacion en el desarrollo nacional. ..Al the beginning of the 21st century, Mexico is multi-colored scenario, where everyday women's claim to occupy participatory spaces in national development increases....- Marta Lamas (2007, p. 15, authors' translation)Situating the Origin of this Special Edition: Transnational/ International/Global FeminismThe terms transnational/international/global have been increasingly common in feminist scholarly literature in the past 15 years. These expressions are frequently used as synonyms to describe feminist epistemology and praxis that propagate political, social, and academic networks between institutions, groups, and individuals across geographic borders. More recent discussions make an important distinction between transnational feminism and international or feminism, with the latter being specifically associated with scholarly analysis of and political movements around globalization processes (Tohidi, 2005; see also Scott-Dixon, 2004). While international connections among women have been present since the beginning of the feminist movement (for example, the International Women's Suffrage Association), the profound impact of economic, political, and cultural globalization on our social imaginaries and lived experience has led to the proliferation of consciousness - think globally, act locally.According to Tohidi (2005), transnational feminism emerges out of the concept of global sisterhood, as defined by Robin Morgan in the 1980s. The juxtaposition of the critique of the idea of sisterhood by feminists of colour for not taking into account the differences between women, along with the intensification of globalization and its impact on women's lives, has led to the conceptualization of transnational feminism (Mendoza, 2002, cited in Tohidi, 2005) as: a politic of solidarity of feminists around the planet that transcends social class, race, sexuality, and national limits.In provocative essay entitled, Globalizing Feminist Ethics, Alison M. Jaggar (2000) analyzes the notion of globalizing feminist discourse. She argues that there is need to establish feminist dialogue that helps break down stereotypes of women outside of Western culture. Northern and Southern feminists must resolve some difficult issues in order to establish this dialogue, such as who can participate and which perspective should be taken into consideration (insider or outsider?) and which issues should be part of feminist agenda. Jaggar (2000, p. 21 ) contends that it is possible to create an imagined feminist community that seeks constantly to be more inclusive, open, and equal in the pursuit of shared self-conception.Aimee Carrillo Rowe (2008, pp. 176-177), in similar tone, uses the metaphor of power lines in her examination of transnational and multiracial feminist alliances:Power lines are webs of heavy cable that criss-cross the globe. They serve to connect us to one another across time and space. They allow us to communicate with others, to build community, to shape the world within and against power relations. In their absence, no such communication/community would be possible. Power lines empower us by enabling our connectivity. They are human-made structures, part and parcel of colonial modernity. These structures, erected through the blood sweat of colonized labor - these structures of wood and metal and heavy cables that sway in the wind - they dig into the earth. Power lines reflect and produce the uneven material relations that give rise to their tall frames.She poses the question: If our vision is to forge more possible feminism, how will we use power lines? (Carrillo Rowe, 2008, p. 177). Indeed, both Jaggar and Carrillo Rowe raise complex questions and concerns for feminists everywhere. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle