Detailed Biosynthethic Analysis of the Y1584C and R924Q Von Willebrand Factor Variants.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric that has a major role in hemostasis by serving as a carrier for FVIII and by mediating platelet adhesion to subendothelium in response to vascular injury. Vascular endothelium is the major site of VWF biosynthesis where it is synthesized as a 2813 amino acid pre-pro-VWF. Following translation, the signal sequence is removed and pro-VWF is dimerized and glycosylated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Multimerization occurs in the Golgi apparatus (GA), and the VWF molecule is either secreted constitutively or stored in the newly formed Weibel-Palade bodies (WPB) and released following a defined stimulus. Quantitative or qualitative defects in the biosynthesis of the VWF molecule are associated with Type 1/Type 3 or Type 2 Von Willebrand disease (VWD), respectively. Most of the missense mutations identified in the VWF gene of patients with Type 1 or Type 3 VWD gene are associated with the ER retention and degradation. In order to elucidate the molecular pathology of Type 1 VWD, a Canadian Type 1 study has been initiated. Y1584C and R924Q have been identified as the most common alterations in the Canadian Type 1 VWD population with frequencies of 13 % (25/194) and 8.5 % (10/117), respectively. Previous in vitro expression studies with recombinant VWF revealed that Y1584C and R924Q result in significant intracellular retention. In this study we report the effect of Y1584C and R924Q on the biosynthesis and function of WP bodies. In order to analyze ER retention of recombinant VWF possessing one or the other missense changes, pulse chase experiments were performed in transfected Cos-7 cells and intracellular location of the recombinant VWF molecules was analyzed by immunofluorescence antibody staining in AtT-20 cells. Pulse chase experiments revealed that both types of recombinant VWF molecules are successfully transported to the GA from the ER. Immunofluorescence antibody staining revealed that both mutant forms of recombinant VWF have a similar subcellular localization to that of wild-type recombinant VWF and that they appear to be stored in pseudo-WPB. In addition to the utilization of the AtT-20 heterologous expression system, the intracellular location of native mutant VWF molecules was analyzed in blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with immunofluorescence antibody staining. BOECs were isolated from a patient who is a compound heterozygote for R924Q and R816W and HUVECs were prepared from a patient who is heterozygous for R924Q. In the R924Q heterozygous HUVECs, normal localization of VWF in WPBs was observed. In the compound heterozygous R924Q/R816W BOECs, both normal and some abnormal larger WPB structures were observed. In addition to these experiments, the ability of the intracellular pseudo-WPB in transfected AtT-20 cells to release recombinant 1584C or 924Q VWF upon treatment with a stimulant (BaCl2) was quantified by ELISA. Pseudo-WPB formed by both types of recombinant VWF molecules were responsive to stimulation and there was no significant difference in the fold-increase in the amount of the secreted VWF between wild-type and mutant VWF constructs. In summary, although molecular basis of the abnormal WPB structures in the heterozygous R924Q/R816W BOECs is still unknown, these studies have demonstrated that neither Y1584C nor R924Q result in major defects in VWF biosynthesis, and that both mutant proteins are associated with the development of pseudo-WPBs that are normally responsive to secretagogues in a heterologous cell system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».