MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2582642816 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.968.968

MicroSPECT/CT Imaging of Human Leukemia Engraftment In NOD-Scid Mice Using [111In]-Labeled 7G3 Anti-CD123 Antibodies

2010· article· en· W2582642816 sur OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey V. Leyton, Catherine A. Gao, Meiduo Hu, John E. Dick, Mark D. Minden, Raymond M. Reilly

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRadioimmunotherapyCancer researchLeukemiaStem cellHaematopoiesisNodMonoclonal antibodyImmunologyBone marrowInterleukin-3 receptorAntibodyMedicineBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyIn vivoCell biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 968 Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is a promising strategy that could improve the long-term outcome of patients. A limitation of current therapies is their inability to eradicate the leukemic stem cell (LSC), which is responsible for causing and propagating the disease and the failure to achieve long-term survival. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 7G3 recognizes CD123 (IL-3R α) in the absence of CD131 (IL-3R β) a LSC characteristic but not of normal hematopoietic stem cells. Our laboratory is developing 111In-labeled 7G3 modified with nuclear localization sequence (NLS) peptides for Auger electron RIT of AML aimed at the LSC. These electrons have only nanometer-micrometer range but are lethal when released inside the cell nucleus. Our objective was to examine the ability of 111In-NLS-7G3 to localize at sites of AML engraftment in NOD-scid mice taking advantage of the concurrent gamma emissions of 111In for microSPECT/CT imaging. These properties were examined in NOD-scid mice engrafted with CD123+/CD131- AML cell lines which avoids the challenges of engrafting primary AML specimens including their variability in engraftment efficiency and heterogeneity in CD123 expression. Alternatively, mice bearing s.c. CD123-transfected Raji (Raji-CD123) tumors were studied. 7G3 was reacted with sulfo-SMCC to introduce maleimide groups for conjugation to NLS peptides (CGYGPKKKRKVGG) then directly derivatized with DTPA for complexing 111In. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of elimination from the blood of 111In-NLS-7G3 intact IgG2a and F(ab’)2 fragments were studied in NOD-scid and Balb/c mice. The effect of pre-administration of a 10-fold excess of unlabeled BM4 IgG2a or IgG1 irrelevant mAbs on the PK was assessed. Imaging and biodistribution studies were performed at 48 to 72 h p.i. of 111In-NLS-7G3 IgG2a and F(ab’)2 in AML-engrafted mice. Sites of engraftment visualized on the images were analyzed for AML by flow cytometry. PK studies revealed an unusually rapid elimination of 111In-NLS-7G3 IgG2a but not F(ab’)2 in NOD-scid compared to Balb/c mice with blood radioactivity levels at 18 h 4-fold lower (3.9 ± 0.9 vs. 17.0 ± 4.4% i.d./ml, respectively). This rapid elimination prevented uptake into Raji-CD123 xenografts and did not allow their visualization by microSPECT/CT. The elimination of 111In-NLS-7G3 F(ab’)2 was not significantly different in NOD-scid or Balb/c mice (0.60 ± 0.17 vs. 0.87 ± 0.06 %i.d./ml, respectively at 72 h p.i.). Pre-administration of unlabeled BM4 improved the retention of 111In-NLS-7G3 in the blood by 3.2-fold and allowed for high uptake (14.7 ± 2.8 % i.d./g) and imaging of tumors. Xenografts also had high uptake (7.2 ± 3.8 % i.d./g) and imaged with 111In-NLS-7G3 F(ab’)2. AML-3, -4 and -5 cells engrafted into bone marrow (BM) and NOD-scid mice assessed by the proportion of CD45+ cells (12%, 0.5% and 63%, respectively). CD45+ cells in the spleen for AML-5 engraftment was 83%. Uptake of 111In-NLS-7G3 F(ab’)2 in the spleen and BM of AML-3 engrafted mice were 5-fold and 1.5-fold higher than 111In-NLS-BM4 control F(ab’)2. The spleen was visualized by microSPECT/CT in engrafted mice receiving 111In-NLS-7G3 F(ab’)2 but not with 111In-NLS-BM4 F(ab’)2. In AML-3 engrafted mice imaged with 111In-NLS-7G3 IgG2a, multiple intense foci of radioactivity were noted in the spine, pelvis and femur, representing leukemia in the marrow. Extramedullary (EM) disease was also imaged in the brain and lymph nodes. Uptake in the femur was 2-fold higher in engrafted mice compared to non-engrafted mice. In AML-5 engrafted mice, outgrowths of AML at the femoral heads was imaged with 111In-NLS-7G3 IgG2a following pre-administration of an excess of unlabeled BM4. No visualization of these AML growths was noted for mice receiving 111In-NLS-BM4. We conclude that microSPECT/CT allowed sensitive detection of the specific uptake of 111In-NLS-7G3 and its F(ab’)2 fragments in AML engrafted mice. PK and Raji-CD123 xenograft microSPECT/CT studies identified a tumor delivery barrier. A robust AML engraftment model was established with cells displaying the CD123+/CD131- phenotype. These results are promising for preclinical evaluation of 111In-NLS-7G3 for Auger electron RIT of AML and suggest that imaging is a useful tool to assess engraftment in NOD-scid mice as well as for evaluating response to 111In-NLS-7G3. Preliminary results of studies to examine 111In-NLS-7G3 for RIT of AML will also be presented. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,333
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207