Quality of Life Following Completion of Treatment for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with a Pediatric-Based Protocol.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2567 Background: The use of pediatric-based protocols in the management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) appears to result in improved survival, particularly in young adults. However, significant treatment-related toxicities have been identified with these regimens, including osteonecrosis and peripheral neuropathy. These are potentially disabling and can adversely affect quality of life (QoL); however, the long-term impact of such treatment regimens on health-related QoL in this adult population has not previously been reported. We therefore aimed to assess various dimensions of QoL in long-term survivors of adult ALL following treatment with a modified Dana Farber Cancer Institute 91-01 pediatric protocol, which is used as standard frontline therapy in our institution. Methods: QoL was self-reported using 5 psychometrically validated instruments: the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue subscale (FACT-F), the Brief Pain Inventory, the Subjective Peripheral Neuropathy Screen (SPSS), and the 9-item Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Standard analyses of each instrument were conducted. Where available, results were compared to published population normative data. Results: 29 patients (median age 41 years, range 21–64, 90% male), in continuous complete remission at a median of 28 months following completion of the two-year treatment protocol, were enrolled between March 2010 - April 2012. In comparison to reference data from a general population, the mean global health score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 was similar (p=0.68), but leukemia survivors had lower cognitive (p<0.001) and social (p<0.001) function scores, as well as more marked financial difficulty (p<0.001). The most prevalent and severe of the symptom items assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 were fatigue and pain, both of which showed significant inverse correlation with global health status and all functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social). Some degree of fatigue was reported by 83% of patients. Evaluation by FACT-F revealed worse fatigue scores for leukemia survivors compared with the general population (p=0.03). Mean pain intensity was higher in those more than 24 months from completion of treatment, vs. < 24 months (p=0.04). In the 9 patients (31%) experiencing moderate-severe pain, the most common sites were joints and neck/back. Of the 10 patients reporting regular use of analgesics, 4 were using opioids. The SPSS identified 12 patients (43%) with moderate or severe symptoms associated with peripheral neuropathy (burning, paraesthesias and/or numbness), mostly affecting the lower extremities. Neuropathy was more severe in patients over age 40 (p<0.01). The PHQ-9 identified 4 patients (14%) with significant depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Long-term adult ALL survivors who were treated with a pediatric-based regimen generally do well in terms of global QoL. However, fatigue, joint-related pain and neuropathy symptoms are common and can negatively affect QoL. Impairments in the domains of cognitive function and social function, as well as the prominence of financial hardship in this population, are findings that warrant further exploration. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».